My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-34 Amending PD Planned Development district 1312 N Water Street
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2017
>
2017-34 Amending PD Planned Development district 1312 N Water Street
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2017 4:33:45 PM
Creation date
7/20/2017 4:33:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2017-34
Res Ord Title
Ordinance Amending PD Planned Development District 1312 N Water Street
Department
Planning
Approved Date
7/3/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpts from Plan Commission Meeting of June 1,2017: <br /> Cal. No. 17-08 Petition of GW PLAZA, LLC, to amend the PD <br /> Planned Development District located at 1312 <br /> NORTH WATER STREET. <br /> Mr. Billy Tyus was sworn in by Mrs. Janet Poland. <br /> Mr. Tyus presented the recommendation of staff: <br /> The subject site is currently developed with a 12 200 square foot mixed use center consisting of a as <br /> J Y p � q g g <br /> station, convenience store, restaurants with ancillary use of video gaming, laundromat, retail and <br /> consumer credit service and is located at 1312 North Water Street. <br /> This site was rezoned to PD Planned Development District in November of 2012 to allow for the <br /> following uses gas station, convenience store, sandwich shop/restaurant, retail and laundromat. This <br /> PD Planned Development District was designed to provide services that would have a positive effect <br /> on the area. <br /> In March of 2013, the City Council approved an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to maintain a <br /> minimum distance of 1,500 feet between consumer credit services establishments. At the time there <br /> was considerable support from elected officials to do even more to limit this type of establishment due <br /> to concerns about the impact on local residents and considerable public outcry for stronger restrictions. <br /> However, it was made clear that—as is the case in this instance—that fair and equitable zoning <br /> restrictions represented the city's legal option for placing such limits. This amendment was approved <br /> because it was found be in harmony with the goals of the Macon County and Decatur Comprehensive <br /> Plan that includes " A Diversified Economy" and "Quality of Life". It was also an effort to curb the <br /> concentration of these types of lending services in certain areas of the City. <br /> Consumer installment lenders, listed as one of the types of consumer credit services that could be <br /> legally allowed on site if this requested amendment is approved, are allowed to charge an annual <br /> percentage rate of up to 36% on loans of more than $4,000 and up to 99% on what are known as small <br /> consumer loans of$4,000 or less not including additional fees according to the Consumer Installment <br /> Loan Act. <br /> It was discovered that a consumer credit service moved into the subject site in August of 2016 after <br /> speaking with the petitioner and representative prior to the September 2016 Plan Commission meeting. <br /> The September 2016 petition was withdrawn and a new petition was to be filed to include a request for <br /> consumer credit service as a permitted use. A petition was not filed in October 2016 nor November <br /> 2016. The owner was cited for a violation of the approved PD Planned Development District in <br /> November 2016. The violation was filed in circuit court and slated for hearing in April of 2017. <br /> Consumer installment lenders, listed as one of the types of consumer credit services that could be <br /> allowed here if this requested amendment is approved, are allowed to charge an annual percentage rate <br /> of up to 36% on loans of more than$4,000 and up to 99% on what are known as small consumer loans <br /> of$4,000 or less not including additional fees according to the Consumer Installment Loan Act. <br /> In March of 2017, the Plan Commission made a motion to table this item until a decision was made by <br /> the circuit court. The Plan Commission was interested in whether the court believed this use was in <br /> fact a consumer credit service. However, while the petitioner admitted to the violation filed in circuit <br /> court in April 2017, the admission was only that the use was in violation of the PD Planned <br /> Development. No determination was made whether the use was a consumer credit service as the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.