Laserfiche WebLink
LEGAL DEPARTMENT <br /> DATE: 10-09-2018 <br /> MEMO: 18-10 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Julie Moore Wolfe <br /> City Council Members <br /> FROM: Billy Tyus, (Interim) City Manager <br /> Wendy L. Morthland, Corporation Counsel <br /> John T. Robinson, Assistant Corporation Counsel <br /> SUBJECT: Amendment to City Code of Decatur Chapter 16, Public Works <br /> Department. <br /> SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to <br /> City Code of Decatur Chapter 16 Public Works Department, attached. <br /> BACKGROUND: When the City is sued for the alleged failure to repair and maintain <br /> public infrastructure such as sidewalks, streets, or parking lots, the Tort Immunity Act <br /> confers immunity upon certain government employees for their performance of <br /> discretionary functions. Immunity applies where an employee holds a position that <br /> requires that he/she employ personal judgment and the tort claim at issue implicates a <br /> discretionary policy determination made by him/her. Policy determinations are <br /> assessments that require the public employee to balance competing interests, and <br /> make a judgment call as to what course of action will best serve each of those <br /> interests. Discretionary acts are those unique to the public office that involve the <br /> exercise of personal judgment and deliberation in deciding whether to perform a certain <br /> act or how the act should be conducted. <br /> Staff have programs in place for regular inspection and repair/maintenance of <br /> most City infrastructure. Additionally, staff routinely investigate complaints of alleged <br /> infrastructure defects, including obtaining from the complainant the precise mechanism <br /> of injury, whether the complainant was a permitted and intended user of the <br /> infrastructure, witnesses, weather conditions, whether the alleged defect was visible to <br /> the complainant, and the nature and objective features of the alleged defect. Where <br /> objective analysis indicates unreasonable danger to the public, the alleged defect is <br /> typically promptly repaired or mitigated. <br /> However, in addition to the above, best practices include designating a high- <br /> ranking official who is authorized to formulate responses to alleged defects in his/her <br /> discretion, (including in the absence of a citizen complaint), as part of the City's regular <br /> inspection and repair/maintenance efforts. This discretion should include using his/her <br /> best judgment to determine which of competing maintenance needs (ranked by degree <br />