Laserfiche WebLink
I have made several other changes to the presentation and format of the proposed budget from <br /> previous years: 1)The proposed budget reduces the total number of activity funds from 52 to 45; <br /> 2) The budget is no longer organized by fund number, but rather by activity class; 3) Principal <br /> activity areas include narrative descriptions of services provided, staffing, budget highlights and <br /> departmental performance outcomes; 4) Greater line item detail has been added to increase <br /> public transparency and to aid in the review and subsequent administration of the budget; 5) <br /> Critical appendices have been added to the budget, including long-term capital improvement <br /> plans, council's strategic plans and goals, and other key documents that should link to revenue <br /> and expenditure decisions in the budget; and 6) there are a few programmatic budget inserts, <br /> added to give a consolidated view of council initiatives that are spread across multiple funds(e.g., <br /> neighborhood revitalization). Staff is not finished making improvements to the budget. For the FY <br /> 2021 budget, staff plans additional enhancements to the presentation and formatting of the <br /> proposed budget, including: 1) Further reduction in the number of funds; 2) Replacing "year-to- <br /> date" revenue and expense totals with "projected-year-end" estimates; 3) Overhaul of the city's <br /> chart-of-accounts (line item descriptions); and 4) the addition of more programmatic notes— <br /> especially where funding activity spans multiple funds. <br /> Authorized total expenditures exceed new 2020 revenues in some funds because in several <br /> cases financial resources have been accumulated over multiple years to be applied to one-time <br /> expenses in 2020 (e.g., water and sewer capital projects, grant projects, etc.). <br /> General Fund governmental expenses constitute $70.3 million, or 39% of the total city budget. <br /> The city's General Fund, the largest single fund in the budget, comprises more than three-fourths <br /> of general governmental activity, and from which nearly 90% of the city staff is funded. The <br /> remaining non-general governmental portions of the municipal budget are allocated to legally <br /> restricted/special purpose activities and proprietary & enterprise business functions (sewer, <br /> water, storm sewer, MFT, Broadband Fiber, etc.). The proportion of general governmental <br /> expenses as a percentage of the city's overall budget has decreased slightly in recent years, <br /> principally because the city has adopted a complex system of charging these special and <br /> proprietary funds for the overhead and administrative services provided by the General Fund. <br /> Although the budget is "balanced," (meaning expenditures do not exceed revenues plus <br /> unrestricted cash reserves), the city's General Fund is not strong. It relies on several one-time <br /> revenues to achieve balancing, and its future expenditure patterns continue to rise at rates <br /> exceeding future revenue patterns. The City Council can address its Genera� Fund structural <br /> imbalance by taking short and long term decisions in the following areas: 1) shift new revenue <br /> creation away from tax-supported streams in favor of user fees and charges for services, and <br /> administrative cost recoveries from new Enterprise/Business activities; 2) seek to reduce <br /> personnel costs over time (preferabfy through attrition) using a combination of outsourcing, <br /> reallocation of responsibilities, plus deployment of labor-saving technologies; and 3) reduce the <br /> overall costs of local government by pursuing intergovernmental cooperative projects, local <br /> service and government consolidations, and by sharing wherever possible. <br /> ii <br />