Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager <br /> DATE: 1/6/2020 <br /> MEMO: 2020-02 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Moore Wolfe&City Council Members <br /> FROM: Scot Wrighton,City Manager <br /> Jon Kindseth,Deputy City Manager <br /> David Greenwell,Building Inspection Manager <br /> SUBJECT: Consideration of Ordinances Amending Chapters 67,67.2,68,69,&70 as they relate to fees. <br /> SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends approval of the five following Ordinances which will primarily <br /> modify the fees staff collects when processing and issuing building permit fees. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> Staff has performed an analysis of our surrounding peer communities and deternuned we are significanfly lower than any others. <br /> More irnportantly than tlus is the fact that the City loses money on our pernutting service as currently provided. Our current fee <br /> structure is very complex and confusing for the average property owner,general contractors,and our staff tasked with <br /> administering this service. The pernut fees are currently found in five separate ordinances depending upon the type of work <br /> being done. Under our current fee model,we lose money on the smallest projects and the larger,more complex projects. <br /> The biggest benefits of this new fee shucture is the si�licity of knowing what the fees are for any project that a person would <br /> undertake. The fees are based on the value of the work being done by the owner or contractor. The City will start charging for <br /> full plan reviews,as opposed to the current structure where plan review and inspection costs are absorbed by the City with the <br /> issuance of a pernut fee. We believe the new fee structure is a more equitable model and thus we have seen this same trend <br /> among other professionally managed communities. Even with this fee increase,it is not eacpected that pernut fees will cover all <br /> expenses related to processing and administering the building department division. Ow fees will be more in line with <br /> unincorporated Macon County after this change,whereas now our fees are only about 50°/a of what theirs are. <br /> Most permits for residential or commercial repairs are not likely to be impacted by this change. Most small projects are only <br /> going to be subjected to the minimum permit fee,thus not significantly impacted by this change. The pernuts that will be <br /> impacted are the smallest fee pernuts like fences,where they were$10 they will now likely be$50. The most significantly <br /> impacted projects are the large new construction projects,where fees were not covering the plan review or inspection costs <br /> historically. Over the next year,the City will sMve to conduct a more detailed analysis of the building division to determine if <br /> these new fees are adequate to cover costs,over if additional changes should be made to get pernut related fees to cover the <br /> administration costs of providing this service. <br /> This proposed increase in building fees was tentatively authorized by the City Council during their review of the recommended <br /> FY 2020 budget. These five ordinance amendments implement tivs council directive. <br /> PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION: A comprehensive permit fees modification has not been done in the past decade or longer. <br /> Most of our current fees are significantly lower than what we believe to be the market average. A brief discussion over raising <br /> pernut fees was had during the budget workshops in November. <br /> POTENTIAL OBJECTIONS: There are no known objections to this recommended approach to the pernut fees. <br /> INPUT FROM OTHER SOURCES: Staff used budget data and fee schedules from our neighboring communities of <br /> Champaign,Peoria,Bloomington,Normal, Springfield,Quincy,and Macon County. <br /> STAFF REFERENCE: Jon and David are available to answer any questions and will be in attendance at the City Council <br /> meeting to provide answers not previously provided. <br /> BUDGET/TIME IMPLICATIONS: Currently taxes and general fund revenues are being used to subsidize the expenses <br /> related to pernutting a new house being built in Decatur,for example. The increase in pemut fees will reduce or eliminate that <br /> subsidy,and set the user fees to a level that pays for the service. <br />