Laserfiche WebLink
9/8/2020 Coversheet <br /> Public Works <br /> DATE: 9/3/2020 <br /> MEMO: 2020-122 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Julie Moore Wolfe and City Council Members <br /> FROM: Scot Wrighton,City Manager <br /> Matthew C.Newell,P.E.,Public Works Director <br /> SUBJECT: <br /> Resolution Authorizing City of Decatur Supplement#1 to the Professional Engineering Services Agreement Between the <br /> City of Decatur and AECOM for Design Services for the Improvement of Brush College Road over Faries Parkway and the <br /> Norfolk Southern Railroad Tracks,City Project 2009-33.Section 09-00933-01-BR. <br /> SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: <br /> It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest. <br /> The City Resolution authorizing Supplement 41 to the professional engineering services agreement between the City of Decatur and AECOM Technical <br /> Services,Inc.,(AECOM)is for the entire project scope and design,as discussed on August 31 for the Brush College Road/Faries Parkway railroad grade <br /> separation project. The supplemental fee is$576,078 for a total design fee of$3,925,745,with$3,350,000 being reimbursed by the Freight Program <br /> ($2,400,000)and the Grade Crossing Protection Fund($950,000). As discussed at the August 31 study session,funding for the remainder($575,745)is <br /> expected to come from additional allocations from the State's Freight Program and the State/Federal Grade Crossing Protection Fund.Although the State has <br /> indicated a willingness to provide this funding,it has not yet been finalized,nor has the exact amount been determined.Finalizing this decision will likely take <br /> several months,and staff does not wish to put the design engineering on-hold in the meantime,as it will disrupt plans for a Spring project letting.It may be <br /> necessary to pay for portions off the design engineering that are not funded by the State/Federal governments from local Motor Fuel Tax Funds,(Section 09- <br /> 00933-01-BR),but this will be reconciled and authorized at a later date. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> On June 5,2018,the City received the announcement of the award of a$25 million grant through the Illinois Competitive Freight <br /> Program for the Brush College/Faries Parkway Grade Separation Project. On November 20,2017,the Illinois Commerce <br /> Commission informed the City that$12 million in Grade Crossing Protection Funds had been programmed for the construction of <br /> the Brush College Grade Separation. On January 21,2020,the Commission approved the release of$2,950,000 of the$12 million <br /> to fund engineering design services and utility relocation costs for the project. <br /> On October 1,2018,the City Council approved a professional engineering services agreement between the City of Decatur and <br /> AECOM Technical Services,Inc.,(AECOM)to perform design services for the Brush College Road/Faries Parkway railroad <br /> grade separation project for a fee of$3,349,667. This fee is being fully reimbursed by the awarded Freight Funds and Illinois <br /> Grade Crossing Protection Funds. <br /> The Project has progressed to the 60%design phase and is working toward a 95%design being completed in late September or <br /> early October. The 60%plans allowed a more accurate project estimate to be prepared which pegged the estimated project <br /> construction costs to be$42.48 million. This is a 67%increase over the estimate based on the initial project estimate based on the <br /> original 2013 preliminary estimate which was$25.35 million. The result is a$17.1 million funding gap which was discussed with <br /> the Council in a study session held on August 31St,2020. <br /> Amendment#1 to the Design Agreement <br /> The current contract value for AECOM's design agreement with the City is$3,349,667. Supplement#1 for$576,078 represents a <br /> 17%increase in the fee. Reasons for the requested fee increase include the following: <br /> 1.An additional 540'of roadway was added to the south end of the project. <br /> 2.Additional retaining wall designs are required with more stringent requirements. <br /> 3.The decision was also made to design the retaining walls to use increased seismic requirements for the retaining walls at <br /> the structure. <br /> hftps://decatur.novusagenda.com/agendapublietCoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=2976&MeetingID=260 1/2 <br />