Laserfiche WebLink
even though the city's total equalized assessed valuation(EAV)could be expected to increase <br /> due to new construction, annexations, reassessments, and other changes. Option Two was to <br /> set the levy at a rate calculated to capture EAV increases due to new construction, annexations, <br /> reassessments and other changes, but not result in a noticeable increase for property owners <br /> who had not experienced any changes in their EAV. Option Three was to levy whatever the <br /> requirements of the five governmental functions listed above were, even if it resulted in a more <br /> significant increase in the property tax.The City Council selected Option Two.This option still <br /> resulted in a modest property tax increase (for just the city's portion of the total levy)of just <br /> over one percent(1%) because we did not complete as many annexations as planned in 2019, <br /> and because of a large devaluation in railroad property. <br /> The attached summary presents the same three options for 2021. In the interests of holding the <br /> line on property tax increases, it is again recommended that the City Council pursue Option <br /> Two. However,for 2021 the funding requirements for public safety pensions (primarily the <br /> Decatur Police Pension) have increased significantly.This increase in public safety pension <br /> funding means that if property taxes remain comparatively level,then the pension increases <br /> must be carved out of a 2021 General Fund that has already been impacted by revenue <br /> decreases created by COVID-19.The City Council can either attempt to absorb these increases <br /> into an already tight General Fund budget, or consider temporarily decreasing funding to the <br /> police and fire pensions and catch-up in future years. Such a decision does not impact pension <br /> benefits of retired/retiring police and fire employees, as benefit levels are set by State statute. <br /> This was discussed as part of the "Nine-Point Plan"for dealing with pandemic shortfalls. <br /> The growth of pension payments underscores the unsustainable nature of police and fire <br /> pension costs—despite action taken by the General Assembly in 2019 to consolidate 650+ <br /> Downstate police and fire pension systems into just two pension funds to obtain better <br /> investment returns. And it is why the city is pursuing ways of providing compensation to public <br /> safety employees without adding to the pensionable base, and exploring ways of decreasing <br /> the number of positions that participate in these pension plans. However, pension strategies <br /> are a subject for a future study session; but they bear on overall tax levy issues which are the <br /> subject of this memo. <br /> 2020 2021 <br /> Police Pension Fund Requirement $4,728,676 $5,577,791 <br /> Fire Pension Fund Requirement 5,884,675 6,200,989 <br /> If the entire cost of police and fire pension contributions were charged to the annual property <br /> tax levy in 2021 (as is permitted by State Law),then 83%of the city's property tax levy would be <br /> dedicated exclusively to police and fire pensions.To blunt such a disproportionate impact on <br /> the tax levy, however,the city decided several years ago to pay for between 14%and 16%of <br /> the total police and fire pension costs using payments in lieu of taxes (PILOTS)from other funds. <br /> For this reason, in 2020, police and fire pension costs were just over 64%of the city's property <br /> tax levy. <br />