Laserfiche WebLink
status and must plan for the financial implications of such a change, to finance extended <br /> disaster recovery, or where the government is saving up for a major capital expense in the <br /> future and temporarily needs higher reserves (a sinking fund of sorts) until the planned <br /> expenditure is paid out. However, absent such circumstances, if the reserve is too high it can <br /> cause questions about whether the local government's taxes and fees are too high, or that the <br /> governing body is not fully deploying citizens' financial resources for their intended <br /> governmental purposes. <br /> A "best practice" General Fund restricted reserve policy is any funding level substantively above <br /> the 60-day GFOA recommended threshold, unless special circumstances warrant something <br /> different. What are such circumstances? Changes made by the Illinois General Assembly that <br /> negatively impact the city's budget usually happen with sufficient advanced warning to allow <br /> the city to plan accordingly. But economic downturns can impact the city's budget rapidly. <br /> Natural disasters and other community emergencies can happen overnight. The Federal <br /> government's current energy and fiscal policies are causing increased economic uncertainty <br /> nationally, and war in Europe could spread beyond Ukraine—which would add greater <br /> economic uncertainty and instability internationally. The future remains uncertain. Whatever <br /> the next disruption or downturn, I recommend that the City Council strive for a General Fund <br /> reserve level that enables the city to get to the next annual budget review and planning cycle <br /> without significant financial stress or radical retrenchment. Here are 3 options: <br /> 1) Leave the existing reserve policy in place (60 days) but continue closely monitoring <br /> monthly balances in a fashion that matches the council's view of the amount of reserve <br /> that is appropriate given current volatility levels and the potential for economic distress. <br /> 2) As requested by a majority of council members in May, amend the policy by increasing <br /> the restricted reserve from 60 days to 90 days (3 months, or 25% of General Fund <br /> expenditures, less capital; language is attached). <br /> 3) Maintain the equivalent of 60 days reserve in a separate account(not in the General <br /> Fund) making it truly a "rainy day fund". Funds could not be withdrawn without a <br /> majority vote of the council. The remaining fund balance would be unrestricted in the <br /> General Fund, allowed it to fluctuate as normal cash flow requirements dictate, but over <br /> time work to increase this amount to 60 days (see language attached). A variation on <br /> this option would be 45 days in the "rainy day fund" and 45 days in the General Fund. <br /> "Unrestricted reserves" are portions of the accumulated year-over-year fund balance that <br /> exceed the "restricted reserve." Generally, unrestricted reserves are assigned to governmental <br /> outlays and public purposes during the annual budget review and adoption process. A separate <br /> "rainy day fund" would be restricted. The effect of a policy decision made by the City Council <br /> regarding its reserves is that whatever fund balance exceeds the amount of the General Fund <br /> restricted reserve(s) will be allocated into next year's budget for lawful governmental <br /> expenditures and included in the spending plan that eventually becomes the City Manager's <br /> Recommended Budget for FY 2023 and following. <br />