My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Motion to Finalize Scope of Proposed Work Fairview/Grand Sewer Project
COD
>
City Clerk
>
MOTIONS
>
2023
>
Motion to Finalize Scope of Proposed Work Fairview/Grand Sewer Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2023 9:45:49 AM
Creation date
5/11/2023 9:45:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk General
SUBJECT
Motion to Finalize Scope
Date
5/1/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
separated system is not combined with sewage any overflows only contain stormwater and do not <br /> create the potential health hazards that this investment is intended to reduce.The other option is to <br /> build a containment basin and return the stormwater to the combined sewer system that contains <br /> wastewater. <br /> The preferred option for SDD is for the City to pipe the stormwater to a permitted stormwater discharge <br /> point keeping the separated stormwater out of the sewer system.If the stormwater system does not <br /> discharge to the sewer system,the connection to a stormwater discharge point would be part of the <br /> City's MS4 permit and would not be regulated by SDD's pretreatment program as no treatment would <br /> be required. <br /> The other option is similar to the residential sump pump connections described above on a much larger <br /> scale which,SDD does not encourage or support.If the storage and reintroduction plan is selected,SDD <br /> would need to provide a permit to the City.Because of the volume of water involved this permit would <br /> be subject to SDD's pretreatment ordinance and would require the City to test and treat the stormwater <br /> to prevent pollutants such as oils and chlorides and other constituents such as nutrients from entering <br /> the sewer system at the detention basin discharge point. <br /> Currently the cost of transporting and cleaning stormwater introduced to the collection system is not <br /> billed to anyone directly because there is no mechanism for recording the volume of water. If a <br /> detention basin is constructed there would now be a discharge point where the water can be measured, <br /> and the City's stormwater utility would be billed for the amount of water entering the system.There <br /> would be no SDD fees if the stormwater remains separated. <br /> Regarding the USEPA Consent Order,it is my understanding that City has submitted a plan to address <br /> the issues,however the USEPA has not responded to the City's plan.The goal of the Basin 5/6 project is <br /> to reduce backups and overflows by controlling stormwater.The best way to do this is to remove the <br /> stormwater from the system and route it to a stormwater discharge point.There is a very real possibility <br /> that the USEPA could object to the storage and reintroduction option after the project is completed and <br /> still require the stormwater to be routed to a MS4 discharge point. <br /> I look forward to hearing from you regarding the City's plan to address this matter. <br /> Respectfully, <br /> I <br /> Kent D.Newton,CPFO <br /> Sanitary District of Decatur <br /> Executive Director/CFO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.