My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2023-120 Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate Terms and Execute an Agreement Between the City of Decatur and Good Samaritan Inn for an Urban Ag Project
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2023
>
R2023-120 Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate Terms and Execute an Agreement Between the City of Decatur and Good Samaritan Inn for an Urban Ag Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2023 9:15:45 AM
Creation date
6/7/2023 9:14:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2023-120
Res Ord Title
R2023-120 Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate Terms and Execute an Agreement Between the City of Decatur and Good Samaritan Inn for an Urban Ag Project
Department
City Manager
Approved Date
6/5/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Protects the surrounding neighborhood from any dangerous chemical/element exposure. <br /> The disadvantage of distinguishing between the two: <br /> 1. May constrain the growth of food access impact. <br /> 2. May constrain the development of permanent structures (like greenhouses) in community <br /> garden settings. <br /> 3. May increase the costs to the city in terms of tracking,accountability, and enforcement. <br /> C. Involve Stake Holders to determine the preparational/operational requirements. <br /> - List of Stake Holders Discussed/Derived: <br /> Old Kings Orchard neighborhood members, Good Samaritan apprentice/front-line <br /> workers, Good Samaritan Director Niki Besser, Good Samaritan Agricultural <br /> Director Ben Frazer,the City Council Designee, the City Manager, Scot <br /> Wrighton, City Public Works Manager, Matt Newell (demolition, street, water <br /> drainage and tree removal),ADM agricultural expertise individuals,Ameren IL, if <br /> poles need to be relocated, a public safety representative to ensure that deleting a <br /> street wont impede emergency response, Macon County Dept. of Health <br /> (determine any use limitations that may arise from the soil testing, or method of <br /> asbestos/building removals). <br /> D. Moving the Project Forward: <br /> Site Preparation: <br /> 1. Soil Remediation <br /> Option 1: Natural remediation of the soil from previous lead or other contaminants <br /> through phytoremediant plant cover: depending on the contaminants present,various <br /> ground cover may meet the site's phytoremediant needs. Phytoremediants include <br /> Sunflower, Ornamental Cabbage, Wheat and Corn, Mustard Greens and Ragweed. <br /> The advantage would be that this is probably the lowest cost option. Short term, <br /> depending on the level of contamination, it may be best for the project to use raised <br /> beds with smaller production until the Phytoremediation is complete.'And the city's <br /> regulations should be clear about how to harvest/dispose of the Phytoremediation <br /> vegetation waste materials so that the elements remediated do not end up ingested or <br /> reintroduced into the soil in the form of compost. <br /> The disadvantage would be that several seasons may be needed, a system for <br /> disposing of the contaminated plant covering would need to be regulated and perhaps <br /> an accountability report would be required to verify the soil is no longer <br /> contaminated, so a determination needs to be made of which officer at the city would <br /> need to issue a permit or track that. <br /> Option 2: State of IL Environmental Protection Agency: If necessary, the plan <br /> could involve designing and installing and engineered barrier to remediate the site <br /> through the State of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's voluntary Site <br /> Remediation Program. <br /> The advantage of using the IEPA voluntary program is that the remediation and <br /> construction plan would be unique for each site and would be based on the site <br /> conditions and the individual grower's needs. This may also open avenues to utilizing <br /> lands that have been used more harshly in the past. <br /> The disadvantage is that it may be a costly, time extensive process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.