Laserfiche WebLink
aquifer. However, some shallow wells or wells with high pump settings <br /> in the area may be negatively affected. <br /> Available drawdown in the pumped well does not appear to be a limiting <br /> criterion. In general, drawdown in a Dewitt well is expected to be only <br /> 10-20 feet larger than the surrounding drawdown in the wellfield. The <br /> current static level in the DeWitt wellfield is approximately 100 feet <br /> above the top of the Mahomet aquifer. <br /> a Rotating production in individual wells in the DeWitt wellfield is not <br /> expected to increase safe yield oi• the operating capacity of the wellfield. <br /> It is recommended that pumpage be distributed. One alternative LGI <br /> considered is to place additional wells in the Cisco area. Two additional <br /> wells could be designed to increase the capacity of the Cisco wellfield to 6 <br /> MGD. The projected cost of these wells would be approximately $130,000 <br /> per well. Pumpage would then be distributed between the DeWitt and <br /> Cisco wellfields. Distributing the pumping in this manner would allow <br /> more water to be pumped for longer periods of time. If economically <br /> feasible, and drawdowns are acceptable, development west of the DeWitt <br /> wellfield can also be considered. <br /> > The probable maximura safe yield for combined withdrawals from the <br /> DeWitt and Cisco wellfields is between 2.55 and 3.10 billion gallons on an <br /> annual basis. This is the total annual withdrawal from the aquifer, and is <br /> not dependent on the pumping duration. Therefore, the wellfields may be <br /> pumped at any rate, but it is recommended that the total amount of <br /> water withdrawn from the aquifer does not.exceed these limits. <br /> i During the 30 day pumping test, it was determined that the current <br /> discharge system is one of the major limiting factors at the current <br /> DeWitt wellfield. The existing system will not allow 24 MGD to be <br /> discharged to the settling basin. In addition, previous studies have <br /> indicated that having the discharge flow to the Sangamon River through <br /> Friends Creek allows a large amount of water to soak back into the <br /> ground. This reduces the amount of pumped water that actually reaches <br /> the treatment plant. Therefore, to minimize losses due to seepage into <br /> the ground and to make the wellfield as efficient as possible, a pipeline to <br /> the treatment plant should be considered. The size and location of the <br /> pipeline should be determined according to the planned use of the <br /> wellfield (i.e. a pipeline extending from the DeWitt wellfield joining a <br /> pipeline from the Cisco wellfield to the plant, or a pipeline just from the <br /> DeWitt wellfield to the plant) <br /> The groundwater model can be utilized in the future in various ways to <br /> manage groundwater resources in the area on an as-needed basis. For <br /> example, the safe operating capacities for non-annual periods of operation <br /> can also be determined by the model. Scenarios can be run to simulate <br /> 70 <br />