My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2012-10 APPROVING CHANGE ORDER 1 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH URS CORPORATION FOR FINAL DESIGN OF THE SOUTH SHORES BRIDGE
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2012
>
R2012-10 APPROVING CHANGE ORDER 1 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH URS CORPORATION FOR FINAL DESIGN OF THE SOUTH SHORES BRIDGE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2015 4:41:25 PM
Creation date
8/21/2015 4:41:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2012-10
Res Ord Title
APPROVING CHANGE ORDER 1 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH URS CORPORATION FOR FINAL DESIGN OF THE SOUTH SHORES BRIDGE OVER THE SANDCREEK ARM OF LAKE DECATUR
Department
Public Works
Approved Date
2/6/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• July 5, 2011 —Council approved Resolution R2011-106 authorizing an agreement with URS <br /> Corporation to complete the final design for the replacement of the South Shores Bridge <br /> over the Sand Creek Arm of Lake Decatur and relocation of the Sanitary District of Decatur <br /> sewer interceptor at a cost of$219,200. Resolution R2011-107 was also approved <br /> authorizing $219,200 in Motor Fuel Tax funds to pay for the design services. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> South Shores Bridge Replacement <br /> The South Shores-Sand Creek Bridge was originally built in 1909. A new superstructure was <br /> placed on the old abutments in 1965. The foundation and abutments are 100 years old and the <br /> super-structure is 45 years old. Routine inspections carried out by City staff and various consulting <br /> engineers since 2004 have determined that the outside beams of this bridge are deteriorating and <br /> have moved with respect to the rest of the bridge. In August 2006,the Illinois Department of <br /> Transportation(IDOT) directed the City to place a weight restriction on the bridge and to perform <br /> follow-up inspections every 6 months to monitor the outside beams of the bridge. Since the <br /> damaged beams are not in the wheel path, the bridge is safe for normal traffic; however, the 6 <br /> month inspections show that the bridge's deterioration is increasing. The bridge needs to be <br /> replaced in the near term before stricter traffic restrictions are imposed. <br /> Public input gathered as part of the design process indicated a desire to raise clearance height of the <br /> replacement bridge. The City Council supported the proposal to raise the bridge by 3 feet. <br /> $1.04 million in Federal Surface Transportation Program—Urban(STU) funding is currently <br /> allocated to fund a portion of the bridge replacement cost. Current preliminary estimates show the <br /> bridge and roadway replacement cost approaching $2.4 million and the cost to raise the Sanitary <br /> District interceptor approaches $500,000. The Sanitary District has indicated a willingness to pay <br /> for the sewer costs. It is proposed that Motor Fuel Tax funds be used to fund the remainder of the <br /> work. <br /> Currently, the project is scheduled for a bid opening by IDOT on June 15, 2012. The South Shores <br /> Drive bridge replacement should begin in August with completion in the early summer of 2013. <br /> One reason for the late start this year is to assure that the current bridge work being conducted on <br /> Baltimore Avenue by the County is completed and that Baltimore is open to traffic before South <br /> Shores Drive is closed. <br /> Amendment Request <br /> To complete the final design and provide assistance during the bidding process, additional funding <br /> is required. A letter from URS is attached which discusses the design issues that arose as the work <br /> progressed. These issues contributed to the need for additional funds to complete the project <br /> design. They are summarized here: <br /> Item 1. IDOT required a noise analysis be conducted for the project. This was to determine <br /> the impact that raising the bridge would have on traffic noise that is heard by nearby <br /> residents. <br /> Items 2-4. Unforeseen conflicts arose between the roadway design and the relocation of the <br /> Sanitary District Interceptor requiring a redesign of the roadway. <br /> Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.