Laserfiche WebLink
Excerpts from Plan Commission Minutes of September 6,2012: <br /> Cal. No. 12-33 Petition of BILLY TYUS, ASSISTANT CITY <br /> MANAGER, for amendments to the City of Decatur <br /> Zoning Ordinance. <br /> Ms. Stickle presented the recommendation of staff: <br /> The current City of Decatur Zoning Ordinance was adopted in May of 2002. Since the time of <br /> adoption, Staff has discovered certain necessary changes, discrepancies and omissions as the new <br /> ordinance has been implemented, specifically in SECTION XXV. Signage. It is Staff s hope <br /> that these changes will make the Zoning Ordinance more comprehensive and applicable to the <br /> changing built urban environment all the while keeping the charge of making Decatur a beautiful <br /> place to live, work and play. <br /> The proposed amendment to Signage involves political signs and laws enacted by the State of <br /> Illinois. The city's current sign regulations do not distinguish political campaign signs from non- <br /> political signs. However, a recent change to the Illinois Municipal Code restricts municipalities <br /> from prohibiting the display of outdoor campaign signs on residential property during any period <br /> of time. Municipalities still may enforce "reasonable restrictions" for the size of political <br /> campaign signs. <br /> Add SECTION XXV.B.16 (Signage-Political Signs): <br /> 16. Political Signs <br /> Outdoor political campaign signs on residential property for residential use are exempt from <br /> the time period regulations and the number of temporary signs to be displayed as outlined in <br /> the following subsections." <br /> Staff recommends approval of the amendment as proposed. <br /> Section XXIX.G. of the Zoning Ordinance requires the Plan Commission to hold a public <br /> hearing and make recommendations to the City Council on amendments to the Zoning <br /> Ordinance. A motion to forward Calendar Number 12-33 to City Council with a <br /> recommendation of approval is suggested. <br /> There were no objectors present and no questions. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Peck/Newton) to forward Cal. No. 12-33 to the City Council with <br /> recommendation for approval as presented by staff. Motion carried unanimously. <br />