My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-40 VACATING PORTIONS OF STREETS - 3700 AND 3800 BLOCKS OF EAST HARRISON AVENUE AND EAST GARFIELD AVENUE; 2000 AND 2100 BLOCK OF NORTH 38TH STREET
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2011
>
2011-40 VACATING PORTIONS OF STREETS - 3700 AND 3800 BLOCKS OF EAST HARRISON AVENUE AND EAST GARFIELD AVENUE; 2000 AND 2100 BLOCK OF NORTH 38TH STREET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2015 1:54:35 PM
Creation date
8/26/2015 1:54:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2011-40
Res Ord Title
VACATING PORTIONS OF STREETS - 3700 AND 3800 BLOCKS OF EAST HARRISON AVENUE AND EAST GARFIELD AVENUE; 2000 AND 2100 BLOCK OF NORTH 38TH STREET
Department
Development Services
Approved Date
6/20/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpts from Plan Commission Minutes of June 2,2011 <br /> Cal.No. 11-15 Petition of ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND <br /> COMPANY, to vacate the Right-of-Way located in <br /> the 3700 and 3800 Blocks of East Harrison Avenue, <br /> East Garfield Avenue and the 2000 and 2100 <br /> Blocks of North 38th Street. <br /> Mrs. Joselyn Stewart was sworn in by Mrs. Janet Poland. <br /> Mrs. Stewart presented the recommendation of staff: <br /> The petitioner is requesting vacating public right-of-way located in the 3700 and 3800 Blocks of <br /> East Harrison Avenue, East Garfield Avenue and the 2000 and 2100 Blocks of North 381h Street. <br /> The petitioner continues to purchase land adjacent to its current facilities and wishes to create <br /> larger pieces of ground for future planning. <br /> All property owners located along East Harrison Avenue and East Garfield Avenue have been <br /> notified by the petitioner regarding the vacation and no objections have been expressed to the <br /> City. The petitioner owns all other adjacent properties. <br /> Letters were sent to AmerenIP, Comcast Communications, and AT&T notifying the utility <br /> companies of the vacation request and no objections to the proposed right-of-way vacation have <br /> been expressed. An easement will be reserved for utility access. <br /> Because there is only one (1) licensed commercial appraiser in the City of Decatur, only one (1) <br /> appraisal was conducted on the property. The proposed vacated property has an estimated <br /> market value of$27,500.00 which will be paid to the City. <br /> The right-of-way is not necessary to serve the general public. Staff is of the opinion that the best <br /> interests of the City of Decatur would be served by approving the request to vacate the right-of- <br /> way. Staff recommends approval of the petition. <br /> The Administrative Policy of the City of Decatur requires that property vacation requests be <br /> submitted for a public hearing. Although a Plan Commission recommendation is not required, a <br /> motion to forward the request of Cal. No. 11-15 to the City Council with a recommendation for <br /> approval is suggested. <br /> Chairman John Mickler asked what happens to City infrastructure, such as fire hydrants and <br /> lighting, when the City approves a vacation of right-of-way. <br /> Mrs. Mary Cave, Public Works, was sworn in by Mrs. Poland. <br /> Mrs. Cave said the existing infrastructure stays in place. They are accessed through utility <br /> easements that surround them. As ADM develops further, the infrastructure would be vacated <br /> and/or moved. Chairman Mickler asked if this is at their expense. Mrs. Cave said yes. <br /> Mr. Kris Kappenman, representative, was sworn in by Mrs. Poland. <br /> Mr. Kappenman said ADM does own all of the properties contiguous with the proposed vacation <br /> with the exception of a railroad property to the south. No homeowners will be landlocked. <br /> There were no objectors present. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Peck/Smith) to forward Cal. No. 11-15 to the City Council with <br /> recommendation for approval as presented by staff. Motion carried unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.