Laserfiche WebLink
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM <br /> No. 11-03 <br /> January 12, 2011 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Michael T. McElroy and City Council <br /> FROM: Ryan P. McCrady, City Manager <br /> Greg C. Crowe, Assistant City Manager <br /> Suzan M. Stickle, Senior Planner <br /> SUBJECT: Amendments to Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance#3512) <br /> SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the amendments to the City of <br /> Decatur Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance #3512) as proposed. The City Plan Commission voted 6-0 to <br /> recommend approval of this petition at the January 6, 2011 hearing; the minutes of the meeting are <br /> attached. <br /> The current City of Decatur Zoning Ordinance was adopted in May of 2002. Since the time of <br /> adoption, Staff has discovered certain necessary changes, discrepancies and omissions as the new <br /> ordinance has been implemented, specifically in SECTION XXV. SIGNAGE and SECTION XXX. <br /> ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS as well as SECTIONS IX., X., XI., and XII. in reference to Day <br /> Care Centers listed under permitted uses. It is Staff's hope that these changes will make the Zoning <br /> Ordinance more comprehensive and applicable to the changing built urban environment all the while <br /> keeping the charge of making Decatur a beautiful place to live, work and play. <br /> BACKGROUND: The first proposed amendments are related to signage permitted in the office <br /> district and for non-residential uses in the residential districts. The intent of changing the ordinance <br /> to allow larger and taller signs in these districts is to allow non-residential uses within residential <br /> districts proper signage without the need to rezone the property to a more intensive zoning. These <br /> uses are compatible with residential uses and should continue to be as such, however, it has become <br /> difficult for these uses to identify themselves with small signage while also adding the latest in <br /> technology. There is a push to rezone these residential districts to other zoning districts in order to <br /> take advantage of these taller and larger signs that allow for the technology of electronic message <br /> units. Changing the zoning may not be compatible with the surrounding area and the potential for a <br /> non-compatible use would then be created if zoning were changed. Another proposed change in the <br /> ordinance would allow a variance to be granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals for electronic <br /> message unit setback to any residential district and/or residential use property/lot line. This will <br /> allow more entities the opportunity to have an electronic message unit with the approval of the Board <br /> and the opportunity for neighboring properties to be heard at a public hearing. The Zoning Board of <br /> Appeals will only be able to reduce the setback distance by 50 percent. If a variance is granted for <br /> the setback of the EMU, the entity will only be allowed to operate the sign from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. <br /> The last proposed amendment is for the change in playground size requirements for daycare centers. <br /> Day care centers are a permitted use in the R-6 Multiple Dwelling District, 0-1 Office District, B-1 <br /> Neighborhood Shopping District and the B-2 Commercial District. The intent of changing the <br /> playground requirements for daycare centers is to be in compliance with the State of Illinois Social <br /> Services Administrative Code. Currently, only part of the playground size requirements are listed in <br /> the Zoning Ordinance. The amendment will include that the size of the playground must <br />