Laserfiche WebLink
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM <br /> PC Cal.No. 10-10 <br /> June 23, 2010 <br /> TO: Plan Commission Members <br /> FROM: Greg C. Crowe, Assistant City Manager of Development Services <br /> SUBJECT: Grand Oaks Estate Petition <br /> Since the last Plan Commission meeting on June 3, 2010, City staff has met with the developer <br /> and their engineers regarding the rezoning petition for Grand Oaks Estate. They also have a <br /> meeting scheduled with the surrounding property owners to further discuss the petition. City <br /> staff feels the developer is taking additional steps to address some of the issues raised by the <br /> surrounding property owners. The three main issues of concern raised along with changes <br /> proposed by the petitioner are listed below: <br /> 1) Concern that the proposed stormwater detention plan is not sufficient. As was noted <br /> in the previous Plan Commission meeting the proposed plan meets all City Standards <br /> for stormwater detention. The petitioner is working with the neighbors to determine <br /> an optimal release rate for all parties involved. <br /> 2) Additional traffic congestion generated from the development. Specifically, as it <br /> relates to the additional curb cut on Route 121 and the delays from traffic turning into <br /> the development. The turning radii have been changed for the Route 121 entrance <br /> that will allow for straight, tandem and fire trucks to enter and exit the development <br /> with more ease. The north radius was increased from 15 feet to 18.5 feet and the <br /> south radius was increased from 15 feet to 40 feet. As was mentioned in the previous <br /> Plan Commission meeting IDOT will require further analysis of the entrance if they <br /> deem it is necessary. The supportive living facility is expected to generate very little <br /> traffic. The banking facility is relocating from another location on Route 121 and is <br /> not expected to generate much new traffic to Route 121. <br /> 3) General concerns of aesthetics of the area being degraded from the addition of a 3 <br /> story development without adequately provided landscaping. In the original plan the <br /> petitioner was exceeding the required landscaping points. In the newly proposed plan <br /> the petitioner has added additional landscaping in the area surrounding the memory <br /> care facility, the stormwater detention area and the south buffer yard between the 3- <br /> story supportive living facility, the bank and Mr. Casey's property. In that buffer <br /> yard, the original plan included 31 norway spruce trees (planting height of 6 feet and <br /> mature height of 30 feet) and 114 spirea and 114 buffalo juniper shrubs. The new <br /> plan includes 78 arborvitae evergreen trees (planting height of 12 feet and mature <br /> height of 30 feet) and 66 austrian pine trees (planting height of 10 feet and mature <br /> height of 50 feet). So, the new plan has converted shrubs in the buffer yard to <br /> additional evergreen trees that are taller when planted and at maturity. This should <br /> help to alleviate some of the sight concerns from the 3 story supportive living facility. <br />