Laserfiche WebLink
J� <br /> u <br /> blighted and a conservation area. One Hundred(100%)percent of the buildings are 35 years of <br /> cn <br /> eG age or older. Only three blighting factors are required to exist in the Area in order to meet <br /> CL statutory requirements as a conservation area. Six(6) blighting factors were found to exist in <br /> --+ the improved portion of the Area with all of them being present to a meaningful extent and <br /> reasonably distributed throughout the Area. These are Obsolescence, Deterioration, Below <br /> Code, Excessive Vacancies, Lack of Planning and Lagging EAV. Moreover, all of these <br /> a� factors are reasonably distributed throughout the area to a meaningful extent. Those qualifying <br /> factors that were determined to exist in the Area are summarized in Exhibit B, entitled <br /> pBlighting/Conservation Factors—Improved Lots. <br /> SECTION VI <br /> THE "BUT FOR" TEST <br /> "The TIF Act's purpose is to eradicate blighted conditions and prevent new ones from occurring. <br /> The intent of the Act is to redevelop blighted areas so as to prevent the further deterioration of the <br /> tax bases of these areas and to remove the threat to the health, safety, morals and welfare of the <br /> public which blighted conditions present." Canton v. Crouch, 79 Ill 2d at 360. <br /> Pursuant to Section 3 of the Act, this Redevelopment Plan can not be adopted pursuant to the Act <br /> unless it is found that the Area has not been subject to growth and development by private <br /> enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of this <br /> Redevelopment Plan. In addition, this Plan must include evidence indicating that the Area, on the <br /> whole, has not been subject to growth and development by private enterprise. <br /> In reviewing the facts and circumstances involving the Area, it was determined that the Area meets <br /> the statutory requirements of the "But For" test based on the following discussion of the relevant <br /> blighting factors as well as other information provided by the City and knowledgeable individuals <br /> who are familiar with the Area and its lack of development opportunities. In addition, the lack of <br /> substantial renovation or updating by the current owner of the Area have contributed to the lack <br /> of development opportunities in the Area. Finally, the proposed purchaser of the real estate <br /> within the Area has indicated that the implementation of Tax Increment Financing and other <br /> inducements is an essential component of its plan to purchase real estate without which the <br /> purchase and redevelopment will not proceed. The presence of the blighting factors, the lack of <br /> investments by current ownership and the unwillingness of a proposed owner to proceed all <br /> demonstrate the need for Tax Increment Financing. <br /> A. The Decline in Equalized Assessed Value <br /> The Area over the last five years has reflected a significant decline in equalized assessed <br /> value of 22.51% compared to a growth in the rest of the City of 12.99%. This indicates a <br /> lack of reinvestment in the Area which is evidenced by the conditions of the buildings <br /> there. <br /> 20 <br />