My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-93 PROHIBITING THE USE OF GROUNDWATER AS A POTABLE WATER SUPPLY
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2009
>
2009-93 PROHIBITING THE USE OF GROUNDWATER AS A POTABLE WATER SUPPLY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 9:53:13 AM
Creation date
8/28/2015 9:53:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2009-93
Res Ord Title
PROHIBITING THE USE OF GROUNDWATER AS A POTABLE WATER SUPPLY BY THE INSTALLATION OR USE OF POTABLE WATER SUPPLY WELLS OR BY ANY OTHER METHOD
Department
Public Works
Approved Date
12/21/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. What is the City's Obligation under a Highway Authority Agreement? <br /> In exchange for entering into a Highway Authority Agreement, the City makes two main <br /> commitments: (1) The City will not allow drinking water wells to tap into the <br /> groundwater under the section of right of way specified in the agreement. (2) If <br /> contaminated soil in the right of way is excavated,human health and the environment <br /> will be protected. Through supplemental agreements with the site owner, the City has the <br /> opportunity to require the property owner to remove or pay for the removal of any <br /> contaminated soil that may be encountered during any construction work. <br /> 4. What is the City's Obligation under a Ground Water Ordinance? <br /> In order to protect public health, the City must prohibit new drinking water wells from <br /> tapping into groundwater within an area determined by the IEPA following an in depth <br /> ground water review by an engineer. Normally the IEPA's rules do not require existing <br /> wells to be closed unless they have become contaminated. Since the City has a public <br /> water supply, this prohibition is not usually a hardship. <br /> 5. What benefit does the City of Decatur gain by entering into TACO Agreements? <br /> The City receives many benefits from entering into TACO Agreements: <br /> 1. Public health is protected by prohibiting use of ground water from contaminated sites. <br /> 2. Redevelopment of"brownfield" sites is facilitated, returning them to productive use. <br /> 3. With a supplemental agreement, the City can require the owner of the "brownfield" <br /> site to give the City a legal release from liability and indemnifies the city for claims <br /> that may be made. <br /> 4. Should the City need to excavate in the right-of-way, a supplemental agreement could <br /> be put in place to require the owner to reimburse the City for the cost of dealing with <br /> the contamination, such as disposing of the waste in a controlled landfill. <br /> 5. By exercising choices provided by TACO rules, site owners and operators may <br /> reduce remediation costs, return more sites to productive use, hasten property <br /> redevelopment, and still fully comply with environmental laws and regulations. <br /> 6. Can the City establish rules more strict than those imposed by the IEPA? <br /> City is generally able to establish rules that are equal to or greater than those established <br /> by the IEPA. The legality of additional rules will likely vary depending on the desired <br /> measure and should in each circumstance be addressed by the Corporation Counsel. The <br /> Highway Authority Agreement and the Ground Water Ordinance used by the City are <br /> typical documents required by the IEPA. The City is able to add conditions through <br /> supplemental agreements such as removal of some or all soil, the payment of fees, <br /> liability indemnification, etc. <br /> Appendix A, Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.