My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-38 AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - URBAN CORRIDORS - FENCES - NON-CONFORMING USES
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2009
>
2009-38 AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - URBAN CORRIDORS - FENCES - NON-CONFORMING USES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 3:40:48 PM
Creation date
8/28/2015 3:40:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2009-38
Res Ord Title
AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - URBAN CORRIDORS - FENCES - NON-CONFORMING USES
Approved Date
5/18/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpts from Plan Commission Minutes of May 7,2009 continued: <br /> needs a consultation concerning their fence the inspectors would go to their property to help <br /> them. His staff will not identify their property lines. <br /> Mr. Jackson asked Mr. Johner how many calls he gets concerning fences. Mr. Johner responded <br /> he gets approximately between twenty-five (25)to fifty (50) calls per season. <br /> Chairman Smith asked if this change would include retaining walls. Mr. Johner stated it would <br /> not. <br /> Mr. Robert Maulding was sworn in by Mrs. Poland. <br /> Mr. Maulding stated he lives at 742 West Forest Street. His property backs up to a thirty (30) <br /> unit apartment building and he has a six (6) foot privacy fence across his back yard. Mr. <br /> Maulding says without his fence his property would not be tolerable. He stated people need to <br /> move into the inner city neighborhoods and he feels if people are forced to get a permit to install <br /> a fence they will decide not to move in. Mr. Maulding stated the property pins on the inner city <br /> properties are almost impossible to find. He does not feel the changes in the Ordinance will <br /> eliminate the few problems the City is having with people building fences on their neighbor's <br /> property. <br /> Mr. Maulding said this matter was brought up at a recent CONO meeting and it was not well <br /> received. <br /> Mr. Maulding does not believe citizens need someone telling them which side of a fence needs to <br /> face the inside or outside of their property. <br /> Mr. Jackson is concerned the fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) is too high. Mr. Anderson said <br /> if you are planning on putting up a fence a twenty-five dollar ($25.00) permit fee would not be <br /> the deciding factor. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Anderson/Mickler) to forward Cal. No. 09-24 to the City Council <br /> with recommendation for approval as presented by staff. Motion carried 6-0-1 with Elayna <br /> Sadorus abstaining from the vote. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.