Laserfiche WebLink
� Comprehensive Physical and Procedural Audit of the Evidence and Property Control System <br /> of practice. Physical audit of items in custody, items disposed of, "aging" of evidence and property in <br /> custody <br /> • Royal Oak(MI) Police Department, 2009 <br /> Physical audit of items in custody, items disposed of, "aging" of evidence and property in custody. Also, <br /> procedural audit of department's evidence and property Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for <br /> currency, legal compliance and proofs of practice and the extent evidence technicians were exercising <br /> the "Right of Refusal" for incomplete evidence inventories and improper packaging and sealing of <br /> collected evidence. <br /> Conducted a comprehensive analysis of the physical security of multiple evidence rooms and storage <br /> facilities used. <br /> • South Elgin (IL) Police Department, 2008 <br /> Physical audit of items in custody, items disposed of, "aging" of evidence and property in custody. Also, <br /> procedural audit of department's evidence and property Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for <br /> currency, legal compliance and proofs of practice and the extent evidence technicians were exercising <br /> the "Right of Refusal" for incomplete evidence inventories and improper packaging and sealing of <br /> collected evidence. <br /> •Jackson (MI) Police Department, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2008 <br /> Conducted annual physical audit of items in custody, items disposed of, and "aging" evidence and <br /> property in custody. Also, procedural audit of department's evidence and property Standard Operating <br /> Procedures (SOPs) for currency, legal compliance and proofs of practice. <br /> Audits included: 1. The accuracy of the information in the property and evidence computer files; 2. The <br /> age of evidence and property in storage; 3. The degree to which packaging and sealing procedures for <br /> evidence packages and the chain of custody are adhered to; 4. The extent to which the "Right of Refusal" <br /> is being used by property and evidence personnel; 5. Extent to which prior year(s) audit <br /> recommendations had been implemented ("proofs of practice") 6. Procedural and physical security of the <br /> evidence management computer system. <br /> •Auburn Hills (MI) Police Department, 2000,2004, 2008 <br /> Physical audit of items in custody, items disposed of, "aging" of evidence and property in custody. Also, <br /> procedural audit of departmenYs evidence and property SOPs for currency, legal compliance and proofs <br /> of practice. In 2000 developed the initial design for the evidence room to be constructed in the new police ', <br /> facility. <br /> •Washington (IL) Police Department, 2007 <br /> Assessed property and evidence records keeping practices as a component of a comprehensive <br /> assessment of the departmenYs records and information management system. Provided technical <br /> assistance for the planning and physical design of a new secure property and evidence storage facility. <br /> •Jackson (MI) Police Department, 2006 -Investigative Audit <br /> Retained as an expert consultant by the Chief of Police to conduct a Procedural Audit and Physical <br /> Inventory of forty five (45) drug and narcotics cases originated, or investigated by a specific criminal <br /> investigator employed by the Jackson Police Department. <br /> Page 6 <br />