My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-25 VACATING STREET - 2600 BLOCK OF NORTH UNION BOULEVARD
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2007
>
2007-25 VACATING STREET - 2600 BLOCK OF NORTH UNION BOULEVARD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2015 11:43:48 AM
Creation date
10/19/2015 11:43:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2007-25
Res Ord Title
VACATING STREET - 2600 BLOCK OF NORTH UNION BOULEVARD
Approved Date
4/16/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stickle stated that the letter was on the Church's letterhead ap�d assumed the person <br /> had the authority to do so. I <br /> Mr. Nordholm stated that the City should post signs for street cl sures just like the City <br /> does for zoning cases. Mr. Nordholm asked how adjacent propert owners know what is <br /> going on if signs are not posted. <br /> Mr. Cochran stated that City staff requires adjacent owners to si n off stating that they <br /> are okay or not okay with proposed street closures. <br /> Mr. John stated that he would not be in favor of the petition. <br /> Mr. Livingston asked whether the Commission would consider t bling the petition until <br /> they could get a copy of the agreement. <br /> Mr. Cochran read a part of the agreement that stated that acce s is guaranteed off of <br /> McKinley. <br /> Mr. John asked if the agreement was recorded. <br /> Mr. Cochran was not aware if the agreement had been recorded. <br /> Mr. John stated that the agreement satisfied all of his concerns. <br /> There were no objectors present. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Mickler/John) to forward Calendar No. 07-13 to the City <br /> Council with recommendation for approval as submitted. Motion arried unanimously. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Oakes/Livingston) to forward Cal ndar No. 07-14 to the <br /> City Council with recommendation for approval as submi ed. Motion carried <br /> unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.