2007-23 AMENDING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - #2 NORTH COUNTRY CLUB ROAD

Home Browse Search

ECONOMIC AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM ' Memo No. 07-55 April 11, 2007 TO: Honora.ble Mayor Paul Osbome and City Council FROM: Steve G ity Manager /�' + Greg C. Cro e,Director of Economic and Urban Develo men�� Suzan Stickle, nior Planne�� SUBJECT: Request to Amend Office District Planned Unit Develop ent at#2 North Country Club Road SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: StatFrecommends denial of th petition to amend the O-1 PUD based on the addition being built on space tha.t was to remain as gr enspace. The City Plan Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of this petition at the A '15,2007 hearing;the minutes of the meeting are attached. BACKGROLTND: The subject site currently contains a 5,580 sq foot office building, a 1,705 ' square foot office building and 54 pazking spaces. , The amendment to the O-1 PUD Office District Planned Unit De lopment is to allow for the � construction af a 1,980 square foot addition to the building in e Southeast portion of the development. The PUD was originally approved in 1994 allowing for 11,400 square f et of office space. Instead the � petitioner constructed a 5,500 square foot building and never installed 1 dscaping to specifications of the approved landscaping plan. Since that time amendments to the PUD have been proposed ' 1. In March of 2000 an amendment was approved allowing for the nstruction of a 1,500 square foot building and an increase of 16 parking spaces. It reduced e total allowable office space to 7,000 square feet. Council voted to approve the amendmen with the understanding and statement by Robert Penwell that the area to the South of th proposed develapment (now known as Suite 2)would remain greenspace. 2. In October of 2001, Council motioned to approve another amen ent to the PUD allowing for additional parking spaces bringing the total number allowed to 5 ,the motion failed. 3. In November of 2001, Council approved the amendtnent to add p�rking after Dr. Brian Penwell stated that he had no intentions of building a third building. The petitioner plans to construct the proposed building expansion on the ea that was to be reserved as greenspace in the 2000 petition as well as was stated at the Council mee g. POTENTIAL OBJECTION: There were no known objectors at the Pl Commission meeting. INPUT FROM OTHER SOURCES: N/A STAFF REFERENCE: Any additional questions may be forwarded to Suzan Stickle at 424-2786 or at smsticklel7a,decaturnet.org. BUDGET/TIME IMPLICATIONS: None