Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br /> Decatur City Plan Commission <br /> COMMON NAME: Amend Section XXV.E.3.a and Section XXV. .3.b (Signs in the Office <br /> Distnct) in the Zomng Ordinance (Ord. 3512, as amended), by Amen mg said Sections. <br /> GENERAL INFORMATION <br /> Hearing Date February 1, 2007 <br /> Calendar No. 07-04 <br /> Requested Action Amendment to Ordinance#3512, as amen ed, Section XXV.E.3.a <br /> and Section XXV.E.3.b (Signs in the Offi e District) <br /> Petitioner Greg C. Crowe, Interim Director, Econom c &Urban Development <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> 1. Staff has received numerous requests for directional and inform tional signs since the sign <br /> provisions of the Zoning Ordinance were adopted. Currently, buildin s within the office districts <br /> are allowed to have one (1) wall sign located on the main building. he maximum area per sign <br /> is 32 square feet, or one-half (1/2) square foot per linear foot of lot frontage, whichever is <br /> greater, to a maximum of 75 square feet. <br /> PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> 2. Staff has prepared amendments for inclusion in Section XXV.E. .a and Section XXV.E.3.b <br /> relative to signs in the (O-1) Office District. <br /> 3. The specific amendments to Section XXV.E.3.a and Section XX .E.3.b are as follows in 4 <br /> and 5 immediately below. , <br /> 4. SECTION XXV.E.3.a. is proposed to be amended by deleting the estriction of just "One (1)" <br /> sign and adding that there would be "No limit; provided that the ag egate square footage of all <br /> wall signs does not exceed the maximum square footage as required b low." <br /> 5. SECTION XXV.E.3.b. proposes to delete "32 square feet or one square foot per each linear I <br /> foot of occupant frontage, whichever is larger, to a maximum of 75 quare feet." and adds "Ten I <br /> (10) percent of the facade or wall on which the sign(s) is/are attache , or one (1) square foot per ��I <br /> linear foot of occupant frontage,whichever is larger." I <br /> STAFF ANALYSIS I! <br /> 6. After reviewing previous sign requests, Staff believes that the roposed amendments will ' <br /> provide a more consistent regulatory framework and make the size a d location of signs similar <br /> to those placed or erected in other commercial districts. <br /> 7. The amendments would allow, with some restriction, more appr priate signage to be placed <br /> on more than one facade or wall. <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> 8. Staff recommends that the amendments to Section XXV.E.3 a and Section XXV.E.3.b <br /> relative to signs in the (O-1) Office District be recommended for appr val as presented. <br />