Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Sekosky stated that he has not spoken to the petitioner but he talked to the �I <br /> representative of the petitioner and stated that the developer might lose one ar two lots to � <br /> provide an emergency entry. <br /> Mr.Nordholm asked that if the developer would have agreed with the recommendation of ' <br /> the secondary access if staff would have approved the petition. <br /> Ms. Miller stated yes. <br /> Mr.Nordholm asked if the petition could be tabled. <br /> Mr. Sekosky stated that he talked with the develaper's representative and that the <br /> developer did not want to table the petition. <br /> Mr. Cochran, representative of the petitioner,was sworn in by Mrs. Althof£ <br /> Mr. Cochran stated that the site was approved as a RDP, Residential Development Plan in <br /> 1979. The plan called for a total of 97 lots in which 51 lots are developed. Southside <br /> Estates Third Addition was approved in 1993 with 21 lots. Mr. Lewis informed property <br /> owners in Southside Estates regarding the new proposed subdivision and there were no <br /> negative responses. Mr. Cochran stated that Mr. Sekosky did inform him of the adopted <br /> fire code at the Technical Review Committee Meeting but has yet to hear a good <br /> explanation on why it is limited to 30 lots. He stated that no informatim was passed on <br /> to him when the fire code was adopted. Mr. Cochran stated that the response time from <br /> EMS will still be the same regardless of how many lots are in the subdivision. The <br /> developer will lose two lots if he agrees with the suggestion of fire. <br /> Mrs. Sadorus asked Mr. Cochran if the developer was going to put single family units on <br /> each lot. <br /> Mr. Cochran stated that lots one through seven will be single family lots and lot eight <br /> through lot 43 will be senior single-family housing lots. <br /> Mr. Steve Lewis,petitioner, was sworn in by Mrs. Althoff. <br /> Mr. Lewis stated that the irregular shaped lot makes it tough to lay out. The initial cost of <br /> the lots and the monthly cost per owner would go up if the number of lots were <br /> downsized. Mr. Lewis stated that he received over 200 responses from area residences <br /> and all were good feedback. <br /> There were no obj ectors present. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Nordholm, Dunn)to forward Cal.No. 06-26 to the City <br /> Council with the recommendation for approval as submitted by the petitioner with Mr. <br /> John and Mr. Smith voting no. <br />