Laserfiche WebLink
DECATUR POLICE DEPARTMENT <br /> MEMORANDUM#07-47 <br /> TO: Mayor Paul Osborne and the Decatur City Council <br /> SUBJECT: Recommendation to City Council <br /> Purchase of new System I(formerly AS/400) machine <br /> DATE: July 27, 2007 <br /> SUBMITTED BY: James Anderson, Chief of Police � <br /> Edward D. Smith, Deputy Chief of Police�o",�C <br />' Dave Johnston, Director MIS �' <br /> SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: <br /> The recommendation of the staff of the Decatur Police Department and MIS is to accept the bid <br /> and purchase the 9406-520, system I machine, as specified from Levi, Ray Shoup, (LRS); <br /> Springfield Illinois for a purchase price of$41,535.00. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> The series I(formerly AS/400) is the data warehouse for all criminal justice activities performed <br /> by the Decatur Police Department and also to some extent the Macon County Records Division. <br />' The operation and maintenance of this machine is of such importance that the recommendation <br /> of the Police Department was to sole source this bid to LRS who have been our sole source and <br /> maintenance provider since 1995. <br /> There were two bids accepted for the new machine, the LRS bid which is $41,535.00 and the <br /> MSI Systems Integrators bid at $38,097.02, a difference of$3,437.98. Though MSI's bid is <br /> lower than LRS, there are some important distinctions that must be made prior to the acce tance <br /> P <br /> of this bid. <br /> MSI went out of the specifications of the bid and proposed an"express"machine, mode19405- <br /> 520. Though this is basically the same machine as specified in the bid there are some issues. In <br /> lay man terms the "express machine is equivalent to purchasing something off the rack,while the <br /> original bid called for a designer machine specifically configured to fit the needs of the Decatur <br /> Police Department. Though there are more"bells and whistles" on the express machine, they do <br /> not come without costs, an example would be the extra '/4 tape drive. This drive was not <br /> specified in the original bid and will add a$25 to $30 to the yearly maintenance cost (per IBM). <br /> The current machine is 10 years old, this added maintenance expense alone would account for <br /> $3000.00 unneeded costs over the life of the machine. <br />