My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-102 VACATING EASEMENT - 821-1011 CEDAR HILL DRIVE
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2005
>
2005-102 VACATING EASEMENT - 821-1011 CEDAR HILL DRIVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2015 2:30:27 PM
Creation date
12/2/2015 2:30:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2005-102
Res Ord Title
VACATING EASEMENT - 821-1011 CEDAR HILL DRIVE
Approved Date
11/21/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 • � <br /> ECONOMIC AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM <br /> Memo No. OS-231 <br /> November 17, 2005 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Paul Osborne and City Council <br /> FROM: Steve G City Manager <br /> Dane C. B g, AICP, Assistant City Manage� <br /> Kathy J. Mi er, AICP, Senior Plannerl�'M <br /> Greg Crowe, Economic Development Coordinat��j <br /> SUBJECT: Vacate Utility Easement—821 through 1011 Cedar Hill Drive <br /> SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the vacation of the platted <br /> easement. The City Plan Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of this petition at the <br /> November 3, 2005 hearing; the minutes of the meeting are attached. <br /> BACKGROUND: John and Dianne Sanner are petitioning to vacate the utility easement on the west <br /> ten (10) feet of Lot 26 to construct a new garage. The petition by Dane C. Bragg, Assistant City <br /> Manager is to vacate the utility easement on the west ten (10) feet of the remaining lots. The utility <br /> companies are not utilizing the platted easement and have approved of the partial release of the <br /> easement. Lot One (1) of Country Club Estates (on East Cantrell Street) will retain an easement for <br /> utility access and is not part of the vacation request. � <br /> INPUT FROM OTHER SOURCES: N/A <br /> POTENTIAL OBJECTION: There were no objectors to the petition at the Plan Commission <br /> meeting. <br /> STAFF REFERENCE: Any additional questions may be forwarded to Greg Crowe at 424-2725 or at <br /> gccrowe(a�decaturnet.org. <br /> BUDGET/TIME IMPLICATIONS: No compensation is required for the easement vacation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.