My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-97 MAKING THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2004
>
2004-97 MAKING THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 11:15:52 AM
Creation date
12/7/2015 11:15:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2004-97
Res Ord Title
MAKING THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF DECATUR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
Approved Date
12/20/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.f •,. <br /> Questions Regarding the Annual Tag Lew <br /> Q: What is the annual taz levy used for? <br /> A: The levy for the most part is used to cover the cost of items such as police and fire <br /> pensions, IMRF, debt service and the cost of health insurance which has been rising at a <br /> staggering rate for cities and private businesses across the country. As you know, these <br /> costs are set by contract, which we have little control over, and have increased by more <br /> than 15% over last year. Funds from the t�levy are not used for salaries or to fund the <br /> day-to-day operations of the city. <br /> Q: There has been a lot of discussion about"stabilizing the tax rate" and��collecting <br /> a proportional amount of tazes". What does this mean? <br /> A: Over a ten year period, property taa�dollazs received by the City has gone up by 27%, <br /> while the assessed value of property has increased by 52%. Simply put,that means the <br /> City is not receiving the incremental(year to year) increase in the property tax base <br /> which the Citv is taking on debt to create. If the city had the means, or had developed , <br /> the means, to receive the incremental share of the rising value of property over the last 10 !, <br /> years, the revenue from property taxes (without the homeowner paying any more) would I <br /> have been$1,688,000 more than it actually was during that same period of time. ' <br /> Q: It has been suggested that this is the way in which the system should work, that <br /> as development occurs taz payers should pay less. Is this not the case? <br /> A: Taxpayers do and will continue to benefit from this development in the form of <br /> significantly lower tax bills than if we were not in a growth environment. However, <br /> simply put,the cost of health insurance, pension and retirement costs, among other <br /> things, in the Midwest have always significantly outpaced the amount the City has <br /> collected from tax payers to cover those costs. Each year we are forced to cover a portion <br /> of those costs from other sources because we do not collect enough as part of our tax <br /> levy. <br /> Q: What will this most recent proposal mean for individual homeowners? <br /> A: It will mean that each and every year, unless your property is reassessed by the <br /> county, you will pay exactly the same amount to the Citv. It is important to remember <br /> that your total property tax bill includes paying the property taxes to School District 61, <br /> Macon County, the Park District, Richland Community College and other t�ing entities. <br /> In fact, of your total tax bill, only about 13.7% goes to the city. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.