My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-52 AMENDING CITY CODE - CHAPTER 34 - TRAFFIC
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2004
>
2004-52 AMENDING CITY CODE - CHAPTER 34 - TRAFFIC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 2:01:37 PM
Creation date
12/7/2015 2:01:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2004-52
Res Ord Title
AMENDING CITY CODE - CHAPTER 34 - TRAFFIC
Approved Date
6/21/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ECONONIIC AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM <br />' No. 04-84 <br /> June 15, 2004 <br /> TO: Mayor Paul Osborne and City Council Members <br /> �, <br /> FROM: Steve G 'ty Manager <br /> Dane C. B irector of Economic and Urban Development� <br /> SUBJECT: Downtown esidential Parking Permit Reinstatement <br /> SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached <br /> amendment to Chapter 34, Traffic, regarding residential pazking permits. The attached <br /> amendment reinstates the Class "B" residential permit which allows unlimited on-street <br /> and surface pazking during all hours for a$60.00 monthly fee. Staff inadvertently deleted <br /> this permit during prior ordinance amendments. <br /> BACKGROUND: When the trial zone pazking plan was adopted in 2002, an unlimited <br /> $60.00 pazking permit was created for residents desiring a "no-hassle" parking option <br /> whereby they could utilize on-street parking in the Customer Parking Zone. Demand for <br /> the permit has been relatively low, however, there aze a few downtown residents who do <br /> utilize the permit and wish to continue subscribing to this permit option. Staff desires to <br /> continue providing this option for residents and had no intention of deleting this <br /> provision from the City Code when amending the downtown parking system. <br /> POTENTIAL OBJECTION: N/A. <br /> INPUT FROM OTHER SOURCES: The City Engineer has also reviewed the <br /> reinstatement and has no objections to the proposed amendment. <br /> STAFF REFERENCE: Any additional questions may be forwarded to Dane Bragg at <br /> 424-2727 or dbrag�(c�,decaturnet.or�. <br /> BUDGET/TIME IMPLICATIONS: N/A. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.