Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br /> DEPARTMENT OF WATER MANAGEMENT <br /> Memorandum No. 2004 — 09 <br /> April 12, 2004 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Osborne and City Council <br /> FROM: Steve Garman, City Manager <br /> John A. Smith, Assistant City Manager far Public Services <br /> Keith D. Alexander, Director of Water Management �� �'I <br /> SUBJECT: Water System Improvements - Phase I li, <br /> Water Capital Project W0328 'I <br /> SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: I <br /> Council adopt the attached resolution approving an Engineering Services Agreement far Water !� <br /> System Improvements - Phase I with Strand Associates for a lump sum of$124,000. I <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> This project is a combination of three separate projects that Staff has been working on: <br /> Security Improvements - A Water System Vulnerability Assessment was completed for the City �i <br /> in October 2003 which recommended a three phase security improvement strategy. The first <br /> phase of these recommendations is included. This is a new budget item for FY05. <br /> South Water Treatment Plant SCADA Improvements - SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data <br /> Acquisition) systems are currently the most effective way to automate water treatment processes <br /> and State mandated process reporting. A SCADA System Technology Plan was completed for <br /> the City in March 2002 which recommended a four phase implementation strategy. The first <br /> phase of these recommendations is included. This is a carryover budget item from FY04. <br /> Water Distribution System Monitoring Network - In order to more accurately monitor water <br /> quality and pressure in distribution systems, many water utilities have installed monitoring <br /> networks. Staff recommends the installation of a monitoring network as an important part of the <br /> City's comprehensive security and SCADA systems improvements. The network is a carryover <br /> budget item from FY04. <br /> Staff mailed 26 requests for qualifications and proposals, obtained and evaluated 4 proposals, <br /> then interviewed the highest rated firm - Strand Associates. Strand received 239 out of 280 <br /> possible evaluation points. The runner up, Black & Veatch, received 221 points. Both firms are <br /> highly qualified and have successfully completed high quality projects for the City. However, <br /> staff recommends Strand Associates due to their higher evaluation score and significantly lower <br /> cost than Black & Veatch for this particular project. <br />