My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2002-156 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2002
>
R2002-156 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 3:59:17 PM
Creation date
1/14/2016 3:59:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2002-156
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT MACON COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT FOR SAND CREEK RESOURCE PLAN
Approved Date
8/5/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resource Problem: <br /> Stormwater and Water Quality Management <br /> Goal: Utilize Best Management Practices to better manage runoff in residential areas and in tum meet <br /> compliance for NPDES Phase II requirements. <br /> Goal: Lower nutrient levels delivered to Lake Decatur. <br /> Action: Develop and enforce ordinance that requires recommended Best Management Pra.ctices for the <br /> site. <br /> Action: Increase a«•areness of stormwater inlets and the floodplain area of Finley Creek. <br /> Action: Improve water quality through nutrient management on cropland focusing on nitrogen <br /> applications <br /> Findings: <br /> Development <br /> Landscape changes caused by development can produce changes in the natural environment. Under <br /> natural conditions, a stream might have flooded once a year,however under developing conditions it is <br /> likely to flood more frequently. Impervious cover such as roads, buildings and rooftops impede water <br /> from filtering into the soil. The unmanaged runoff ca.uses peak flows in the stream. The stream cha.nnel <br /> then becomes enlarged causing scouring of the stream bottom and streambank sloughing. Research has <br /> shown that impervious cover of as little as 10 to 15 percent of a watershed can have significant adverse <br /> effects on channel conditions. Proper stormwater planning and design can reduce peak runoff raLes and <br /> the damages to the environment. <br /> Floodplains <br /> The base flood elevation(BFE) is the elevation that the base flood would reach every one hundred years. <br /> This area is the 100-year floodplain and has the potential of flooding to the BFE once every one hundred <br /> years or a 1%probability of flooding ea.ch year. However,this does not mean that this magnitude of <br /> flooding cannot occur more often. Within the floodplain are the floodway and the flood fringe. The <br /> floodway includes the stream channel and overbank area. Beyond the floodway is the flood fringe that <br /> makes up the rest of the floodplain. Fill or structures put in the floodplain can alter the base flood <br /> elevation and raise it to a higher level because the fill displaced the flood storage area. <br /> Water Quaiity <br /> I,ake Decatur serves as a drinking water source for the City of Decatur and village of Mt. Zion. IEPA has <br /> rated Lake Decatur as a Priori 1 Restorative. The L , <br /> ty alce met the re uirement f r <br /> . q o the hi hest cate o <br /> g g �� <br /> Pnority 1 and was classified as restorative because it is a primary public water supply source having <br /> "Partial" drinking v��ater supply use support or was identified as having Maximum Conta.mination Level <br /> MCL � <br /> ( )violations. <br /> Illinois has a drinking water standard of 10 milligrams per liter(10 mg/1) for nitrate(N). This standard is <br /> mandator5�for public water supplies. Lake Decatur has exceeded this standard from 1979 to 1993 and <br /> 1996 to 2002. Typically�, nitrate levels rise above the mandator�• standard in late spring through summer � <br /> and late winter. The nitrate concentrations in Lake Decatur come from the nitrate loading on the land. The �� <br /> City of Decatur has monitored the I,a1ce Decatur watershed trying to understa.nd nitrate yields in the ' <br /> watershed. The goal is to reduce the nitrate levels by implementing BMPs on the land and reduce nitrogen <br /> loading. An example from the Lake Decatur. Illinois Case Study Nitrate Reduction for SDWA <br /> Compliance in an Agricultural Watershed (1996) stated, "...a 25 percent reduction in N fertilizer II <br /> application over the entire watershed was projected to result in a nitrogen concentration of 8.9 mg/1 in <br /> water flowing into Lake Decatur after a one-year storm, compared with 11.6 mg/1 for the base run with li <br /> current application rates." <br /> OS/31/02 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.