My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2002-100 ACCEPTING THE BID AND AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2002
>
R2002-100 ACCEPTING THE BID AND AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2016 11:09:02 AM
Creation date
1/19/2016 11:09:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2002-100
Res Ord Title
ACCEPTING THE BID AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT KNOLLWOOD DRIVE STREET RECONSTRUCTION
Approved Date
6/3/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION FORM <br /> Engineering & Infrastructure Memorandum <br /> NO. 2002-27 <br /> May 24, 2002 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Howley and City Council <br /> FROM: Steve Garman, City Manager <br /> Stephen Swanson,P.E., Director of Engineering & Infrastructur� <br /> Matthew C. Newell, �.E., City Engineev,Nyj <br /> SUBJECT: Knollwood Drive Street Reconstruction City Project 2001-34 <br /> SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: <br /> It is recommended by staff that the City Council approve the attached resolution awarding the <br /> contract for Knollwood Drive Street Reconstruction, City Project 2001-34, to Entler Excavating <br /> Co., Inc., in the amount of$137,338.05, and that the Mayor be authorized to execute the contract, <br /> and the City Clerk to attest. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> The pavement restoration work needed on Knollwood Drive is beyond the scope of standard <br /> pavement rehabilitation methods. Total street reconstruction is proposed for the street. This will <br /> consist of the removal and replacement of the Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavement, curb <br /> and gutters, driveways, etc. The reconstruction will include significant drainage work to route <br /> storm runoff from the pavement surface and attempt to intercept high ground water in the area. <br /> This project was proposed with two alternate pavements, asphalt concrete (Alternate #1) and <br /> PCC (Alternate #2). For this project, the PCC alternate is considered by staff to be the better <br /> pavement cross section and is the preferred alternate when favorable bids are received. The <br /> reasoning that suggests the PCC alternate to be preferable is that, in this instance, the pavement <br /> section is structurally stronger than the asphalt alternative. This means that it is likely that the <br /> pavement will last longer under the expected loads and require less maintenance. It is reasonable <br /> to expect that the asphalt alternate will require more extensive maintenance over its life than will <br /> the PCC pavement. In comparing the low bids for each alternate, the PCC alternate is <br /> approximately $8,000 more than the asphalt alternate. The maintenance and restoration savings <br /> expected with the PCC pavement will more than make up for the added initial construction cost. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.