My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-80 VACATING A PATHWAY - GREEN HILL DRIVE TO CORMAN STREET - RADIO TOWERS SUBDIVISION
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2003
>
2003-80 VACATING A PATHWAY - GREEN HILL DRIVE TO CORMAN STREET - RADIO TOWERS SUBDIVISION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2016 9:46:14 AM
Creation date
1/28/2016 9:46:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2003-80
Res Ord Title
VACATING A PATHWAY - GREEN HILL DRIVE TO CORMAN STREET - RADIO TOWERS SUBDIVISION
Approved Date
12/15/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. . <br /> rdholm uestioned exactl where the line was and if the church would be on the II, <br /> Mr. No q y <br /> north side and ClymerBallinger would be splitting the vacation. Ms. Miller responded , <br /> that the line would be down the middle. ' <br /> Mr. Nordholm asked how far north it would go. Ms. Miller said the pathway extends all <br /> the way from Corman Street to Green Hill Drive all the way through. <br /> Mr. John asked when the parking lot and shed were built across the pathway. Ms. Miller <br /> stated the path was called an easement at the time of the variance request and site plan <br /> review and was within the last five (5)years. <br /> Mr. John asked whether it was used by the neighborhood prior to the parking lot as a <br /> place to walk. Mr. John believes the City should be keeping pathways friendly to <br /> pedestrians and bicycles. Mr. John questioned if the petition was not approved and was <br /> not vacated,what would happen to the parking lot. <br /> Ms. Miller stated that the shed and fence would have to be removed; the parking lot could <br /> remain; the driveway on the south portion would have to be removed. <br /> Representing the petitioner, Evan Horath,was sworn in by Ms. Jesse. <br /> Mr. Horath stated that when the building was built in 1999, they did have permission <br /> from the City to pave over the pathway for their parking lot. <br /> Mr. John asked if the shed would be removed if it were not vacated. Mr. Horath stated <br /> this is the main entrance and they would do what had to be done. Mr. John asked if it <br /> was possible to continue to allow pedestrian's access to the pathway between Corman <br /> Street and Green Hill Drive but still allow parking lot to remain. Ms. Miller stated that <br /> could be an option. <br /> Mr. John asked at what point the no motorized vehicle sign was posted. Ms. Miller stated <br /> that it did come along later when the subdivision was developed only because mini bikes <br /> and other ATV's were being used on the pathway. <br /> Mr. John asked whether it was used by neighbors. Ms. Miller stated that it was used <br /> numerous years ago as a walk through to the school bus. <br /> There were no objectors present. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Nordholm/Dunn) to forward Cal. No. 03-55 to the City <br /> Council with recommendation for approval as submitted by petitioner. Motion carried <br /> with Commissioners Anderson, Peck, Wakeland, Dunn, Nordholm, and Sadorus all <br /> voting to forward to City Council for approval, and Commissioners John and Smith <br /> voting for denial. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.