Laserfiche WebLink
, . <br /> , • ` Page 2 <br /> � Memo re: Holiday Harbor Planned Unit Development <br /> Apri129, 2002 <br /> 3. Landscaping on-site in conformance with the provisions of the proposed Landscaping <br /> Regulations; <br /> 4. A landscaped boulevard along Holiday Harbor Parkway including a grass median and tree <br /> plantings; <br /> 5. Ornamental lighting similar to that used along West Main Street adjacent to Millikin <br /> University; <br /> 6. Trash enclosures for all dumpsters, grease traps and waste facilities; <br /> 7. Monument-style signage on a brick base, combined with free-standing signage throughout the <br /> site; <br /> 8. The ability to provide a wayfinding system to unify the development; <br /> 9. Prohibition of inetal facades except for Lot Eight (8), which will utilize a brushed aluminum <br /> farade to accommodate a prototype building; and <br /> 10. No billboards will be permitted on the property. <br /> Staff has provided analysis of this project based on the six standards of Section 21, paragraph C <br /> of the Zoning Ordinance: <br /> 1. Compatibility with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and general area. The <br /> proposed development is part of a larger tract that has been held for several years in <br /> anticipation of commercial development. The property adjoins the Holiday Inn Select and <br /> has high visibility from U.S. Route 36. Uses have been so arranged to afford a more <br /> residential character to the south end of the site, which corresponds with the existing uses <br /> along West Main Street. <br /> 2. The effect of the proposed Planned Unit Development upon the immediate area. The <br /> developer has designed the PUD in a way that it will be accessed primarily by U.S. Route 36. <br /> It is not anticipated that the development will have a negative impact upon the immediate <br /> area. <br /> 3. Whether or not an exception from the minimum zoning regulations is warranted by virtl:e of <br /> the design and amenities incorporated into the development plan. There are no exceptions to <br /> the Zoning Ordinance requested. All development on the site will meet the minimum <br /> standards of the ordinance. <br /> 4. That the proposed Planned Unit Development is in accordance with the general intent of the <br /> Zoning Ordinance and the Decatur Urban Area Land Use Plan. The proposed PUD conforms <br /> to the Zoning Ordinance and the permitted uses within the B-2 District. The proposed use is <br /> commercial in nature, as is shown on the Decatur Urban Area Land Use Plan. <br /> 5. That the existing and proposed streets are adequat� to carry anticipated traffic within the <br /> proposed Planned Unit Development and in the general vicinity thereof. The proposed <br /> streets meet the standards of the Engineering and Infrastructure Department and have been <br /> approved by the Illinois Department of Transportation. It is not anticipated that there will be <br /> any traffic problems generated by the development. <br /> 6. That existing and proposed utility services are adequate for the proposed development. The <br /> developer has satisfied all utility requirements for the site. <br />