My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-17 REZONING PROPERTY - 2200 NORTH UNION STREET
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2002
>
2002-17 REZONING PROPERTY - 2200 NORTH UNION STREET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2016 2:52:15 PM
Creation date
3/1/2016 2:52:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2002-17
Res Ord Title
REZONING PROPERTY - 2200 NORTH UNION STREET
Approved Date
4/15/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Decatur City Plan Commission <br /> April 4, 2002 <br /> Page Three <br /> sidewalks, and landscaping. The PUD only includes improvements outside of the parking lots on <br /> the north side of the street. The width of the boulevard (the green space between the curb and the <br /> sidewalk)varies from three feet to 19 feet. The boulevard will be landscaped with ornamental <br /> trees and shade trees. The distance between the four-foot sidewalks and the curb of the parking <br /> lots varies from four feet to eight feet. This section contains a hedge serving as a headlight <br /> screen for the adjacent parking lots. <br /> Mr. Van Steenhuyse stated that the rezoning request for the parking area will bring the parking <br /> area into conformance with the zoning of the property that it serves. Since the rezoning request <br /> is followed by a PUD, it may only be used for parking unless an amendment to the PUD is <br /> approved by the City Council. He went on to explain that the PUD request meets the su� the <br /> considerations listed in the Zoning Ordinance that the Plan Commission must take into account <br /> when making a recommendation on a Planned Unit Development: 1)The PUD is compatible <br /> with the character of the surrounding area; 2) The PUD does not have a negative effect on the <br /> immediate area; 3)Are requested exceptions to zoning standards warranted by the provision of <br /> superior design or extra amenities? There are no variances to the Zoning Ordinance requested in <br /> this PUD; 4) The PUD is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan? 5) Existing and proposed <br /> streets are adequate to handle ti�e anticipated traffic; and 6)The existing and proposed utility <br /> systems are adequate to handle the proposed development. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the request to rezone the parking area at 2200 North Union from <br /> R-3 to O-1. Staff further recommends approval of the O-1 Planned Unit Development for the <br /> parking area and the former Hay Street right-of-way. The PUD request meets the considerations <br /> enumerated above. <br /> Mr. Schiller noted that the sidewalks will be four feet wide and not five feet wide. Mr. Van <br /> Steenhuyse stated that the City standard for sidewalks is four feet. <br /> Mr. John stated that the staff report had mentioned the proposal is in conformance with the <br /> Comprehensive Plan and it is not. Mr. Van Steenhuyse apologized for presenting the report <br /> quickly and stated that the plan is expected to be amended within the next few years regarding <br /> the expansion of Decatur Memorial Hospital. <br /> Mr. John asked if there were any additional plans known. Mr. Van Steenhuyse stated that the <br /> plans before the Commission were the only ones submitted. Campus additions would be <br /> reflected in the future Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Mr. Shampine asked if the times and dates had been set regarding the gate proposed by the <br /> hospital. Mr. Van Steenhuyse stated that would be part of the agreement between the church and <br /> the hospital. Mr. Shampine asked if the Commission and/or staff would be part of that and Mr. <br /> Krieger answered no. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.