My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-82 VACATING PORTION OF STREETS - 2200 BLOCK NORTH UNION STREET - 300-500 BLOCKS WEST HAY STREET
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2001
>
2001-82 VACATING PORTION OF STREETS - 2200 BLOCK NORTH UNION STREET - 300-500 BLOCKS WEST HAY STREET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2016 9:13:38 AM
Creation date
3/2/2016 9:11:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2001-82
Res Ord Title
VACATING PORTION OF STREETS - 2200 BLOCK NORTH UNION STREET - 300-500 BLOCKS WEST HAY STREET
Approved Date
12/17/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. . . _ <br /> Mr. Cochran stated that showing the commission a street closure with a cul-de-sac would not <br /> change this situation. He stated that the hospital has addressed several safety issues with the <br /> church. Mr. Cochran stated that the sewer cannot be built over but it could be paved over. The <br /> hospital needs control of the roadway for safety reasons, one of which is controlled access to the <br /> site. <br /> Mrs. Howley asked how Decatur Memorial Hospital's control would take precedence over taJc <br /> payer's wishes. She stated that Decatur Memorial has m�de the appearance of being a good <br /> neighbor. Mrs. Howley stated that it seems the safety of the hospital patients is more important <br /> than the safety of St. Thomas parishioners. She stated that she is not for the selling of City <br /> streets. <br /> Mr. John stated that he did not have the information needed to make a recommendation on the <br /> petition which would have a significant unpact on the neighborhood and land use. <br /> It was moved and seconded(John/Setina) to table Cal. No. 01-47 to be considered with the <br /> Planned Unit Development. Motion carried at a vote of six to three. Commissioners voting yea: <br /> Anderson, Claypool, John, Peck, Setina and Washington. Commissioners voting nay: Sands, <br /> Shampine and Schiller. Commissioners Clevenger and Smith abstained from the vote. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.