My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-60 DESIGNATING A HISTORIC DISTRICT - MACON PLACE
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2001
>
2001-60 DESIGNATING A HISTORIC DISTRICT - MACON PLACE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2016 10:44:49 AM
Creation date
3/2/2016 10:44:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2001-60
Res Ord Title
DESIGNATING A HISTORIC DISTRICT - MACON PLACE
Approved Date
8/6/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HASC Public Hearing <br /> July 12, 2001 <br /> Page Three <br /> maintained for children to come out and play and the homes can be passed on to the children. <br /> The designation provides a sense of security that elements important to the integrity of a <br /> structure would remain. Any elements removed, such as stained glass, fish scales, or porches <br /> would decrease the value of the structure. In this area, property values have double and tripled. <br />' Mr. Joe Hibbard, 233 South Edward,was present and asked if the Commission would insist on <br /> painting a house rather than siding. Ms. Miller stated that in most instances, the original cover of <br /> the house is best. It has been proven in several workshops that siding is not a solution and allows <br /> further damage to a structure. It is important that if siding is used that the significant elements of <br /> the house and the windows are not covered. <br /> Mr. Hibbard stated that he appreciated and understood the explanation. He stated that he shares <br /> Mr. Hatcher's concerns and asked the process for being removed from the petition. <br /> Ms. Miller stated that the district as proposed will be presented to City Council. The Council can <br /> alter the petition or accept the petition as it is presented. Ms. Miller stated that there have been <br /> 47 certi�cates reviewed by HASC in the last two years. Only two of those petitions were <br /> partially denied and the Commission worked with the homeowners to find solutions so that the <br /> certificates were not denied in full. <br /> Mr. Hibbard stated that he likes the neighborhood and the interaction but he does not like this <br /> petition and doesn't want to be part of it. He stated that he might be replacing his roof and asked I <br /> if inetal would be allowed. Ms. Miller stated that each request is reviewed individually. She � <br /> stated that Mr. Hibbard could write a letter either to her or to the City Council requesting to be <br /> removed from the petition. <br /> Mr. Atwater stated that there is no protection for these homes from demolition such as was done <br /> by Millikin University without the local designation. Also, if there were ever grant money from <br /> the federal or state government for these homes, the area would have to be locally designated (or <br /> National Register designation) to receive the funds. <br /> Mrs. Potter stated that HASC is an advisory commission to the City Council. She stated that the <br /> Commissioners have backgrounds in various aspects of historic preservation and decisions are <br /> based on the information received. <br /> Mr. Hatcher stated that his home was built in the 1800's and he would provide the correct <br /> information regarding the date. <br /> Mrs. Cross stated that the National Register listing would not be affected by the local <br /> designation. She stated that the national listing does little good as there is never any grant money <br /> and the protection is almost nonexistent unless the project is federal which is unlikely in a <br /> residential area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.