Laserfiche WebLink
. Excerpts from Plan Commission Minutes of March 1, 2001 <br /> Cal. No. 01-02 Petition of ROBERT D. and JiJDITH M. CURRY, 4275 East <br /> Lake Shore Drive, to vacate the 15' Right of Way adjacent to <br /> Lot 68 of Spangler Heights Addition. <br /> Ms. Miller presented the recommendation of staff: <br /> Spangler Heights Addition was platted in the 1920's and developed with cottages that have since <br /> been turned into homes. The areas east and south of the platted lots were designated as <br /> Community Park when the Addition was platted. In four locations adjacent to Lake Shore Drive <br /> (Spangler Drive), 15 foot right of ways were designated as access to Community Park. <br /> Community Park extends to East William Street Road. The Sanitary District has sanitary sewer <br /> lines located in the Community Park area near the lakefront. <br /> The Decatur Metro Area Greenway Plan includes a potential greenway/bikeway trail from Nelson <br /> Park to Faries Park that could include the Community Park area. At this time there is no set route <br /> for that trail system. After consulting with the Decatur Park District regarding trail planning, it <br /> was determined that it would be highly unlikely that a bike trail would ever go behind the <br /> residential properties at the lake front. The referenced ROW would not be required for trail <br /> access. Currently there is ROW access along William Street Road. <br /> The petitioner would like to vacate the ROW that cuts through his property to add a garden and <br /> to construct a retaining wall at the lake front. <br /> An appraisal for the proposed ROW for vacation was submitted with an estimated market value <br /> of$950. A consent letter was received from the adjoining property owner, Mr. Thomas M. <br /> Grohne, that agrees to the purchase by Mr. Curry. Utility letters have been received from the <br /> Sanitary District of Decatur, Insight Communications, Ameritech and Illinois Power. Illinois <br /> Power has requested that ingress and egress easements be reserved for utility maintenance. No <br /> city utilities are located in the referenced ROW. Staff recommends approval of the ROW <br /> vacation with the utility easement noted in the ordinance. <br /> Mr. Smith asked if other right of way had been vacated in that area. Ms. Miller stated that there <br /> had been a few streets vacated north of the subject axea. <br /> Mr. Shampine questioned if there is access to get to the lake. Ms. Miller stated that there is no <br /> other access owned by the City. The property owners in this area use the land as their property <br /> although technically their property does not go all the way to the lake. The lake belongs to the <br /> City. Mr. Van Steenhuyse stated that there are two more access points to the lake plus the ravine. <br /> Mr. Smith asked if the check would be written to the City. Mr. Van Steenhuyse stated that the <br /> City owns the right of way. <br /> Mr. John stated that he did not see the other points of access. Ms. Miller stated that it is difficult <br /> to discern the points of access as they are being used by the property owners. Mr. John stated <br />