Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM ! <br /> � - NO. 97-123 <br /> November 24, 1997 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Terry M. Howley and City Council Members <br /> FROM: James L. Williams, ., City Manager <br /> Debora L. Bean, ting Director of Community Development/��i3 <br /> Robert A. McQueen, Senior Planner <br /> SUBJECT: Ordinance Rezoning 1612 North Oakland Avenue <br /> The subject petition requests that premises commonly known as 1612 North Oakland Avenue be <br /> rezoned from R-3 Single Family Residence District to B-1 Neighborhood Shopping District. <br /> Containing a total of 12,000 square feet, the area iri question is presently platted as two separate <br /> lots. The lot on the immediate northeast corner of North Oakland Avenue and West Division <br /> Street is vacant while the second lot is developed with a single family dwelling. As submitted by <br /> petitioner, the reason for requesting rezoning is to use the premises for development and <br /> operation of an accounting office. <br /> Upon review of land use and zoning patterns for the general area, staff notes that adjoining <br /> properties on all sides are presently zoned R-3 Single Family Residential with properties to the <br /> north, south and east being accordingly developed with single family dwellings. Property to the <br /> west across Oakland Avenue is vacant land the majority of which is that of Graceland Cemetery. <br /> Notwithstanding the single family area as noted, it is important to note that the subject lots front <br /> on Oakland Avenue (State Route 48), which is classified as a major arterial street. Further, <br /> properties generally located approximately 700 feet to the north and 500 feet to the south along <br /> the east side of Oakland Avenue are zoned B-1 Neighborhood Shopping District and B-2 <br /> Commercial District respectively and developed with commercial uses. <br /> Recognizing the existing land use and zoning patterns as noted, staff is of the opinion that the <br /> subject lots are desirable for office or commercial use. In rendering this opinion, we further note <br /> that the rear of the subject lots adjoin the rear of residential lots to the east having frontage on <br /> Gulick Avenue. Consequently, the a11ey separating the rear of these lots would provide a logical <br /> and stable zone boundary line between residential and commercial development; such zone <br /> boundary separating residential and commercial zoning presently exists to the north and south of <br /> this tract as noted above. <br />