Laserfiche WebLink
r ' - , . <br /> Of•�EC <br /> � G <br /> v o0 <br /> � ��� <br /> '/�IINO�Y <br /> 7une 10, 1997 ; <br /> PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM <br /> NO. 97-59 � <br /> MEMO1tANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council � <br /> FROM: James L.Williams, Jr., City Manager <br /> Bruce A. McNabb, P.E., Director of Public Works <br /> Matthew C. Newell, P.E., Tra�ic Engineeriy� <br /> SUBJECT: Implementation of Pronosed Downtown Parking Chan�es: <br /> Increase of Parking Meter Rates and Modification of Parking <br /> Meter Timings in City Parking Lots 1,3, 4, 5, and 10 <br /> An item on the agenda for the City Council meeting of Monday, June 16, 1997, is an <br /> ordinance modifying parking lot meter timings and increasing parking lot meter rates. This <br /> ordinance is a major portion of the proposed downtown parking changes as requested by the <br /> Downtown Decatur Council and is consistent with direction given to staff from the City Council. <br /> The proposed parking meter rate increases are specifically addressed in the Downtown <br /> Council's proposal. The Downtown Council's proposal increases parking meter rates in the City <br /> Parking Lots from $0.10 and $0.20 / hour to $0.25 / hour. City staff is recommending that the <br /> proposed parking lot rate increases be applied to Parking Lot #1 along with the other lots. Unless <br /> this rate increase is made on a11 parking lots, undo pazking pressure will be experienced in Lot #1 <br /> due to its cheaper rate,thereby causing greater parking problems in and around the lot. <br /> These revenue increases were proposed by the Downtown Decatur Council to offset the <br /> loss of revenue caused by the removal of parking meters in the downtown core area. It has been <br /> specifically stated by the Downtown Council that "a proposed parking plan should not adversely <br /> affect the net revenues generated for the City of Decatur." Staff is firm in its recommendation <br /> that cunent total revenues be maintained for the Motor Vehicle Parking System. If another <br /> source of revenue is not provided to make up for the significant reduction in on-street parking <br /> revenue, the Motor Vehicle Parking System will no longer be a self sustaining fund, While it is <br /> sta�s belief that the maintenance of on-street parking revenue is the best revenue source, an <br /> increase to the parking lot rates appears to be the next best option for obtaining the needed <br /> revenue. <br />