My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
96-78 REZONING PROPERTY
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
1996
>
96-78 REZONING PROPERTY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2016 11:45:45 AM
Creation date
3/21/2016 11:45:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
96-78
Res Ord Title
REZONING PROPERTY - 124 WEST MARIETTA STREET
Approved Date
12/2/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM <br /> NO. 96-193 <br /> November 26, 1996 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Terry M. Howley and City Council Members <br /> FROM: James L. Williams, Jr., City Manager <br /> George C. Weaver, Director of Community Development�• <br /> Robert A. McQueen, Senior Planner CL{i�'" <br /> SUBJECT: Ordinance Rezoning Property at 124 West Marietta Street <br /> The subject petition requests that premises commonly known as 124 West Marietta Street be <br /> rezoned from R-6 Multiple Dwelling District to O-1 Office District. Conta.ining 3216 squaze <br /> feet, the lot in question is presently developed with a single family dwelling. The purpose of the <br /> proposed zone is to allow a portion of the subject tract to be used as a driveway to serve the <br /> adjoining tract to the immediate east, which tract was zoned O-1 Office District in July, 1993. <br /> Recognizing the adjoining O-1 zone as noted, and that the west line of this tract is bound by an <br /> alley, staff is of the opinion that the proposed zone is a logical extension of the existing office <br /> classifica.tion, and that it would be consistent and compatible with land use and zoning patterns <br /> of the general neighborhood. The location of a zone boundary line along the alley as noted <br /> provides a logical separation between residential and non-residential land use; staff does not <br /> envision further extension of the non-residential zoning classifica.tion west of this point. <br /> Inasmuch as this tract is relatively small in width and area, staff is of the opinion that the <br /> ultimate best use would be to incorporate it with the adjoining O-1 tract to the immediate east. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the petition as presented. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.