My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2000-260 ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ENGAGEMENT LETTER FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000
>
R2000-260 ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ENGAGEMENT LETTER FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2016 2:15:15 PM
Creation date
3/24/2016 2:15:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2000-260
Res Ord Title
ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ENGAGEMENT LETTER FOR CONSULTING SERVICES GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD 34 - IMPLEMENTATION
Approved Date
12/18/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Our proposed study will seek to provide general direction for the City and will comprise a <br /> GASB 34 readiness assessment from a fixed asset and �infrastructure perspecrive. With this <br /> study we will: <br /> • Review GASB Statement No. 34 as it relates to the fixed assets and infrastructure of the <br /> Village with you and accounting staff and representatives of Engineering, Public Works, <br /> Water and Sewer, Streets and Mass Transit Departments and others deemed appropriate by <br /> you. <br /> ! Assess existing information regarding fixed assets and infrastructure that is available within <br /> the City. <br /> • Seek to determine what information regarding infrastructure assets is incomplete or lacking <br /> necessary data elements. <br /> • Consider GFOA Strategy on Infrastructure as it relates to the City and the potential election <br /> of limiting retroactive reporting to major classes of infrastructure, defining classes of <br /> infrastructure narrowly, retroacrively reporting to 1980 only, using estima.tes whenever <br /> possible, using composite approaches to depreciation, and other issues. <br /> • Begin to define infrastructure assets, ciassifications and units of ineasure. <br /> • Begin to address asset inclusion and exclusion per GASB Statement No. 34 and per general <br /> materiality. <br /> • In general, review asset inventory, aging, costing and lifing. <br />� <br /> • Seek to consider options and various approaches. <br /> • In a review meeting, discuss acrivities, observations, and findings in general. <br /> In conducting our study we plan to interview appropriate staff within the City at the department , <br /> level to determine the extent of available information andJor the extent of information that is <br /> lacking. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> As with other governments and other studies we have conducted, we hope to find potential <br /> economies and efficiencies with our work. This is coupled with our interpretation of GASB <br /> Statement No. 34 and the inherent flexibility and allowance for management decisions in <br /> implementation. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.