My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2000-67 AUTHORIZING CONTRACT OR CONTRACTS
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000
>
R2000-67 AUTHORIZING CONTRACT OR CONTRACTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2016 10:18:47 AM
Creation date
4/6/2016 10:18:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2000-67
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING CONTRACT OR CONTRACTS - NEAR NORTH REDEVELOPMENT AREA - CBR URBAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Approved Date
5/8/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STEP I: TABLE OF SHARED BELIEFS & VALUES <br /> For the past several years, I have sought answers to some major development questions regard- <br /> Much of what 1've asked ex erts and ractitioners <br /> ing Decatur and, more importantly, i� people. p p <br /> to give responses to dealt with the material well-being of central city residents, given the degree <br /> to which the city and private developers propose to redevelop neighborhoods. Hence, the <br /> amount of space I've devoted to expioring redevelopment and reinvestment specific to poor, in- <br /> ner city people. Maybe i've been unclear, or maybe I've elected to raise issues at inappropriate <br /> or untimely junctures during fonims and updates associated with instant redevelopment efforts. <br /> My thoughts following recent developments in Decatur have furthered anchored and solidified <br /> my viewpoint concerning the pathologies, risks and needs of our population which is in need of <br /> targeted economic development What I mean here is that, how can we suggest economic devel- <br /> opment, inclusive of all citizens of the City of Decatur, without, first, establishing some consen- <br /> sus as to what such efforts should attempt to achieve (I believe that I appreciated this notion in <br /> your written comments)? <br /> The need for inclusfve economic deve/oament is predicated on the proposition that any compre- <br /> hensive action, if expected to be successful, must be preceded by a systematic thought or ra- <br /> tionale which justifies its undertaking. This is the nature of my query associated with my analy- <br /> sis of the instant Near North Project (i.e., how can low-income residents be expected to inhabit <br /> $80,000 homes without a�rmative lending assistance and higher wage job opportunity?, etc.). I <br /> believe that once such an analytic framework has been formulated then a plan of action or strat- <br /> egy for economic development can be derived from the principles and insights of the analysis. <br /> Not being an economic development theorist or practitioner, 1 have often had discussions with <br /> long time community civic leaders, heads of improvement and protest organizations, and activ- <br /> ists, and the sum of our interchanges lead me to advance two major hypotheses or assumptions: <br /> 1. The central city of Decatur has experienced something of a "market failune"in capital and la- <br /> bor for sometime now, and it is necessary for and incumbent on government to intervene <br /> and correct such economic-related aberrations. <br /> 2. Local economic development policy and programs fail to appreciate the notion that the[total] <br /> local market's well-being and welfare wiil be increased by favorabiy changing the occupa- <br /> tional and income stnictures for unemployed and underemployed workers. <br /> How much better off would Decatur be if it [now] dedicated herself to completing the task of ad- <br /> dressing and eradicating the effects of past and present economic neglect and decline of her <br /> central city spaces and people by repairing the physical and economic damage done there? My <br /> question is more that just rhetorical. Put into more practicai terms, my question can be sub- <br /> divided into three additional questions: <br /> 1. Given the wealth of redevelopment activity completed, began and proposed in and for Deca- <br /> tu�'s central city, how will the configuration of the markets and the location of economic ac- <br /> tivity be shaped by the activity for the best interest of central city residents? <br /> 2. How will the activity function for the good of central city labor markets? <br /> 3. How will the activity interact with the acquisition of skills and general training for central city <br /> prospective workers? <br /> Further, what is the best system of education, quality and quantity of housing, goods and ser- <br /> vices for residents, environmental issues, and local job opportunities for Decatur? The answers <br /> to these and other matters require us to convene, immediately, on a tab(e of shared beliefs and <br /> values about what economic development for Decatur should be. Here, we should hammer out <br /> resolutions for advocacy, job training and placement, business support, and enterprise and at- <br /> traction strategies,with which we believe will result in ample reinvestment in and revitalization of <br /> the central city and its people. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.