My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R98-142 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1998
>
R98-142 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2016 2:02:37 PM
Creation date
4/11/2016 2:02:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R98-142
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT FOR FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATOR
Approved Date
10/19/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT <br /> RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION <br /> MEMORANDUM NU. 98-078 <br /> October 14, 1998 <br /> TO: The Honorable May r and City Council Members <br /> FROM: James L. Williams, , City Manager � <br /> Beth B. Couter, Di ctor of Financial Management �� <br /> J. Barry Leonard, Risk Manager���� � <br /> SUBJEC`T: Flexible Spending Account Administrator <br /> Tratismitted herewith is a Resolution Authorizing Agreement with �Iista Administrators, <br /> Inc. for third party administration of the City's Flexible Spending Account (FSA) for the 1999 <br /> contract year. <br /> Ft. Dearborne, aur current FSA Administrator, notified us that as of January 1, 1999, they <br /> will no longer administer FSA's. <br /> Staff sent out fifteen Requests for Proposals (RFP) for a new F5A administrator and <br /> received four responses. Based on overall program costs, we selected two finalists, Health Plan <br /> Management of Lake Bluff and Vista Administrators, Inc. of Aurora. <br /> A phone survey of current and past clients was conducted on each finalist. The <br /> comments on Vista were all laudatory with frequent reference to Vista's "quick response" to <br /> client questions or problems. The comments on Health Plan Management were very mixed. <br /> They received high marks for health claim processing but only "fair" for FSA processing. <br /> A cost comparison between them shows that Health Plan Management's monthly fee <br /> would be less than Vista's but if we face similar problems, as current clients have, it will create <br /> participant displeasure leading to reduced participation. The current participation does save the <br /> City more than $16,000 per year in payroll taxes. Vista's monthly fee is the same as the current <br /> administrator. <br /> Given the cost considerations and client service reputation, staff recommends Vista <br /> Administrators to be our new FSA administrator. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.