My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R98-25 AUTHORIZING ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1998
>
R98-25 AUTHORIZING ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2016 1:33:33 PM
Creation date
4/12/2016 1:33:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R98-25
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
Approved Date
2/16/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpts from Plan Commission Minutes of February 5, 1998 <br /> Cal. No. 98-07 Petition of RIVERBEND DEVELOPMENT, INC. to rezone a tract of <br /> land generally located 1/8 mile (660)feet south of East Mound Road and <br /> 1/4 mile (1320) feet west of Brush College Road from R-1 Single Family <br /> Residence District to M-1 Light Industrial District. <br /> Mr. Phillip Cochran, Consulting Engineer, was present and spoke for the petition representing the <br /> petitioner, Mr. Adam Mervis. Attorney John Sanner was also present. Mr. Cochran stated that <br /> the request is to rezone 24 acres of agricultural property outside the city limits to M-1 Light <br /> Industrial which connects to Lot 6 of L& A Industrial Park. Access would be off of L & A <br /> Industrial Drive which intersects with Brush College Road. The property is contiguous to <br /> Meadowlark Subdivision an�is within 600 feet of Mound Road. The request for rezoning is in <br /> accordance with the e�sting Comprehensive Plan which shows the area from L& A Industrial <br /> Park to Mound Road and from Meadowlark to Brush College Road as light industrial. <br /> Mr. Cochran stated that he and the petitioner have worked with City staff and Council on an <br /> annexation agreement which binds the developer to develop the property in accordance with the <br /> provisions as stated. The petitioner is aware of and has sensitivity to the residential area to the <br /> west. As part of the annexation agreement there is no access allowed to Chat Drive. There will <br /> be an eight foot ta11 berm as a sight and sound barrier along the west side of the subject tract and <br /> extending south to the south line of Lot 6 of L& A Industrial Park. There will be no construction <br /> or paving within 75 feet of the residential area(west property line). <br /> Mr. Cochran stated that the proposed development containing a total of 37.6 acres is proposed <br /> for a truck distribution facility. Lot 6 is zoned M-2 and there are no conditions on the <br /> development of Lot 6 for industrial use. In ganting an M-1 zone the City Plan Commission and <br /> City Council would be granting a degee of protection to those within the nearby residential <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Mrs. Washington questioned access to the area. Mr. Cochran stated that Lot 6 has access off L <br /> & A Industrial Drive which intersects with Brush College Road. The r'oadway has been <br /> constructed for this type of development and high density truck tra.ffic; the road is public right of <br /> way and is a City street. <br /> There were objectors present: <br /> Mr. Joseph Lee, 3336 Chat Drive, was present and stated that he was not necessarily in <br /> opposition to the petition but was concerned about the berm which he wanted set back from his <br /> property line. Mr. Lee stated that the subdivision floods and the storm drainage is inadequate. <br /> He is not opposed to the proposed business but does not want his property damaged. He <br /> requested that there be a fence at the top of the berm and questioned the business hours. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.