Laserfiche WebLink
The Cisco Well Field was constructed in the mid 1950's to provide a source of supplemental <br /> water. This well field consists of two wells located along the Sangamon River, approximately 13 <br /> miles upstream of the City's North Water Treatment Plant. The wells discharge into a small <br /> surface channel that drains directly to the Sangamon River. Well #1 has been inoperable since <br /> 1993. A seepage study was conducted in 1991 by the U.S. Geological Survey to deternune the <br /> estimated loss of water between the well field and Lake Decatur. The USGS study estimated the <br /> seepage loss to be 65 percent of the rated capacity of the well field. <br /> The Water Resources, Storage and Production Study of the City's water system, prepared in <br /> 1996 by HARZA Consulting Engineers and Scientists under contract to the City, recommended <br /> making additional studies of these two well fields. This recommendation noted the need for the <br /> City to determine the reliable production capacity from the well field and the impacts to the �, <br /> neighboring private wells. This information is important to enable the City to make critical <br /> decisions regarding the expected production and delivery of water from the well fields to meet the � <br /> City's water resource needs. Staff agreed with this recommendation and prepared a Request for �I <br /> Proposal (RFP) to obtain professional services to perform the required studies prior to the City � <br /> committing major capital investments for the delivery of water from the well fields. <br /> The RFP was sent to several firms and two government agencies capable of providing the <br /> expected services for the needed study. Four proposals were received. Proposals were received <br /> from, listed in alphabetical order: <br /> Ground Water Associates, Inc. <br /> Illinois State Water Survey <br /> Layne GeoSciences, Inc. <br /> United States Geological Survey <br /> After a review of the proposals, staff decided to interview three of the proposers before <br /> making its final recommendation. The three proposers interviewed were: Ground Water <br /> Associates, Illinois State Water Survey and Layne GeoSciences. The selection committee decided <br /> that Layne GeoSciences best met the needs of the City for this study. Staff has completed <br /> negotiations with Layne GeoSciences for the agreement. A copy of the agreement is attached. <br /> The services include an evaluation of the existing condition of the well fields to advise the City of <br /> needed repairs and upgrades to the well fields. This information will be used to further assess the <br /> costs of the water the City would receive from its well fields. The study will also identify the <br /> extent of the impacts on neighboring wells when the City operates its well fields. This will <br /> provide a basis for the City to develop its strategies and programs to mitigate these impacts. <br /> The agreement makes provisions for additional 5-day pumping tests or an extended 30-day <br /> pumping test should the City decide this additional testing is needed based on the information and <br /> data obtained in the study. The step drawdown test included in the scope of work is expected to <br /> provide sufficient and reasonable data and information for use in the computer model to make the <br /> determinations regarding the well fields. An additional option, is for City staff to be trained in the <br /> use of the computer software used by the consultant to model the well field and Mahomet <br /> Aquifer. Staff is of the opinion, at this time, that the expected limited use of the software by staff <br /> does not justify the training. <br />