My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2016-63 AUTHORIZING A MULTI-YEAR AGREEMENT - Bainbridge, Gee, Milanski & Associates, Inc.
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2016
>
R2016-63 AUTHORIZING A MULTI-YEAR AGREEMENT - Bainbridge, Gee, Milanski & Associates, Inc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2016 9:42:29 AM
Creation date
6/13/2016 9:42:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2016-63
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING A MULTI-YEAR AGREEMENT WITH BAINBRIDGE, GEE, MILANSKI & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM - CITY PROJECT 2016-05
Approved Date
6/6/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Construction of additional sewer conveyance capacity; <br /> 3. Construction of storage basins or tanks within the system;and <br /> 4. Tasks to reduce private property UI contributions including private <br /> property inflow inspections(e.g. sump pump inspections)and/or <br /> smoke testing. <br /> ii. An estimation of the cost of each alternative considered; <br /> iii. An estimation of the benefit(in terms of either the UI in gallons removed or <br /> SSOs.Unauthorized Combined Overflows and Property Backups <br /> prevented); <br /> iv. A green infrastructure evaluation that will consider potential green <br /> infrastructure measures to reduce and/or eliminate sources of UI; <br /> v. A prioritization of the alternatives and a schedule for implementation of the <br /> alternatives chosen,with a final completion date of the chosen alternatives <br /> . no later than December 31,20l 8; and <br /> vi. Analysis of the cost effectiveness of the chosen alternatives, including the <br /> impacts on Respondent's user rates. <br /> 47.After EPA's review of Respondent's submission of the Sewer Collection System <br /> Alternatives Analysis,EPA s�all either approve or provide comments concerning the <br /> Sewer Collection System Alternatives Analysis. <br /> 48.Within 90 days of receipt of any EPA comments on the Sewer Collection System <br /> Alternatives Analysis,Respondent shall adrlress those comments through submission of <br /> responses and/or a revised Sewer Collection System Alternatives Analysis. <br /> 49.After EPA's review of Respondent's submission of responses and/or a revised Sewer <br /> Collection System Alternatives Analysis,EPA shall either approve, disapprove,or <br /> provide additional comments to be addressed by the Respondent within a time period <br /> specified by EPA. <br /> 50.Within 60 days of EPA's appmval of the Sewer Collection System Alternatives Analysis, <br /> Respondent shall begin implementing the recommendations of the Sewer Collection <br /> System Alternatives Analysis as approved or amended by EPA on the schedule contained <br /> in the approved Sewer Collection System Alternatives Analysis. The implementation <br /> schedule,as approved or amended by EPA shall be incorporated into this Order. <br /> 51.If EPA determines that Respondent unsatisfactori}y responded to EPA's comments <br /> conceming the disapproved Sewer Collection System Alternatives Analysis,Respondent <br /> . 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.