Laserfiche WebLink
F,?CC�2Pri5 FRf�'I <br /> . • � �'IC & PARF�IG �II'I'I� ME�I'Il�TG <br /> JUNE, 1994 <br /> I • <br /> �1�i #1 R�equest for stap signs at P�ole arid Division Streets. <br /> Matt Newell based his staff reoc�unend,ation on the law voltnne of traffic at <br /> this intersection. Durir�g the pexiod frcen 1990 to 1992, the.re were twr� <br /> accicients. 7�e accident rate is slightly a�ove average for an intersection <br /> with tYus volwne. It is no�t laxge, but the.re is a sight problem hes�e. Zhe <br /> avexage traffic s��eci is a}x�ut 30 �ah, which is a little exr.�ssive for an <br /> intersectiori lik,e this. He recw�xls that yield signs wr�uld work at t,�us <br /> inte.rsectian instead of stap signs, because there are few cars to cause <br /> accidents. He would not be able to say if yield signs wr�uld do a lort of good, <br /> bu�t they are a better alternative than stap signs. <br /> Dave 000k thc�aght it look�d lik�e ttit�ee streets ccav.ing together with an alley. <br /> He daes nc�t see a prabl�n unless p��le are speedirr.� dawn Division. <br /> Dax� Ripley saw a n�m�er of caxs travelir�g t2�h the intersection when he <br /> insPected th�e ax�ea. He agz�eed that it was tricky definux� w3w had t�� right <br /> of way. He wduld agree that placing a yield sign wauld better defir�e the <br /> inrt.ersec.•tiari. ' <br /> _ Glen Norcltwlm wc7i.11d see no probl�n with yield signs on Poole bot-h ways. II <br /> � , <br /> Lt• Mark Barthelemy agi�eed it neec3s sc�ne kir�d of signage, beeause he was also �I <br /> ooi�'u_sed with the in�ion. Bec�,ause �x� traffic staps to the sauth, <br /> t3e w�uld think Poole wauld still be the tht�a.2qh street. Because of lvw <br /> traffic voltm►e, yield sigrLs wotil.d be good instead of st�p signs. He also <br /> believes th�-e is a tei-rible siqht hazard at the r�orthwest cori�.r due to the <br /> , hcx��e beitx� so close to the intersectian. <br /> Newell ac�ded th,at the average aocident rate is 1.5 aocidents per millioaz <br /> vehicles, which i.s slic�tly lawer than the px�evaili.r�g rate at this inte�- <br /> tian. <br /> Nordholm believes a pn�blem exists because Peole is so nat�raw, ar�d that may be <br /> �Y � �s are laaer. <br /> S��rY M��1 stated that she start,ed the petition wheii a child was hit by a <br /> �r �n this interse�tion• She wauld prefer a sign be placed on Peole instead <br /> of Division. <br /> Asr�ith Horve added that drivers think Division is a thrnuqti stx�eet and dr� nQt <br /> expect Fbole to be a sti�t. <br /> ��1�' stated that the staff x�ecce�unendation i.s to define liability at this <br /> intexsec..�tioai. �3ecause of this, the traffic s�s may inaease an Division. <br /> � <br /> _ It was moved and seconded (Non9hol�/Cook) to accept staff reoaim�tian that <br /> yield signs facir�g R�ole Street be install�l to better define Division Street <br /> as th�e �ro�}l street. Zhexe be.ing no ane a�osed, the motion carried. <br />