Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> . . <br /> Mr. Chamblin stated that a chip rock lot would be an acceptable <br /> compromise. Mr. McQueen stated that staff would be willing to <br /> review the paving issue with agreement of the commission. Mrs. <br /> Jameson stated that she would prefer the chip rock alternative to <br /> asphalt. <br /> Mr. Swartz questioned if the building can be torn down or altered <br /> under the provisions of the special use permit. Mr. McQueen <br /> stated that the special use permit pertains to the specific use <br /> in the building. <br /> Mr. ChaYnblin stated that there is no provision to prevent <br /> personal use by the owner of the building. The structure can be <br /> demolished just by applying for a demolition permit. He stated <br /> that was not his desire which is why he had looked for a new <br /> owner with the same type of concern for the building. <br /> Mr. Swartz questioned if the special use permit limited the <br /> business to a frame shop. Mr. McQueen stated that it does. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Swartz/Clevenger) and approved that I <br /> Cal. No. 93-63 be forwarded to City Council with recommendation <br /> for approval per staff stipulations with the change regarding the , <br /> parking area. Motion carried unanimously. j <br />