My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
93-64 AMENDING SPECIAL USE PERMIT - M-2 EXTRACTIVE USE - SOUTHSIDE DRIVE
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
1993
>
93-64 AMENDING SPECIAL USE PERMIT - M-2 EXTRACTIVE USE - SOUTHSIDE DRIVE
>
93-64 AMENDING SPECIAL USE PERMIT - M-2 EXTRACTIVE USE - SOUTHSIDE DRIVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2016 10:40:00 AM
Creation date
8/16/2016 10:39:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
93-64
Res Ord Title
AMENDING SPECIAL USE PERMIT - M-2 EXTRACTIVE USE - SOUTHSIDE DRIVE
Approved Date
9/20/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, . . , <br /> City Plan Commission Meeting of September 2, 1993 <br /> Cal. No. 93-53 Petition of WLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY to amend <br /> and expand a special use permit granted by <br /> Ordinance #5991 and subsequently amended to <br /> allow extraction of sand and gravel on tracts <br /> of land generally located north of the 900 <br /> block Southside Drive and west of the 1100 <br /> block South Monroe Street. <br /> The petitioner was not present. <br /> Mr. McQueen stated that the petitioner was unable to attend this <br /> meeting; however, a request was made for the Plan Commission to <br /> take action. This petition was reviewed last month to <br /> accommodate expansion of the mining operation to within 50 feet <br /> of the west property line and to include an area now occupied by <br /> a sludge lagoon owned by the City of Decatur. Also, the scale <br /> station and access road would be relocated along the south side <br /> of the property. <br /> Due to an error in the original legal description, it is <br /> necessary to conduct the subject hearing. The proposed amendment <br /> and supporting exhibits are the same as those reviewed and <br /> approved last month. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the petition as presented. <br /> There were no objectors present. , <br /> It was moved and seconded (Kaptain/Gruenewald) and approved that �I,I <br /> Cal. No. 93-53 be forwarded to City Council with recommendation , <br /> for approval. Motion carried unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.