My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
93-27 AMENDING SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - SUMP PUMP AND ROOF DOWNSPOUT DRAINS
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
1993
>
93-27 AMENDING SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - SUMP PUMP AND ROOF DOWNSPOUT DRAINS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2016 2:27:32 PM
Creation date
8/16/2016 2:27:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
93-27
Res Ord Title
AMENDING SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - SUMP PUMP AND ROOF DOWNSPOUT DRAINS
Approved Date
5/17/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, .. <br /> Excerpt from Minutes of the March 4, 1993 City Plan Commission <br /> Cal. No. 93-10 Petition of DAVID A. CLARK, DIRECTOR OF <br /> COI�IIKUNITY DEVELOPMENT, to amend the Sub- <br /> division Ordinance (Ord. ,�80-56) rela.tive <br /> to drainage facilities for sump pwaaps. <br /> Mr. Weaver spoke for the petition stating that the Plan <br /> Commission does not often hear proposed changes to the <br /> subdivision ordinance but these types of petitions are within the <br /> scope of responsibility of the Commission. The proposed change <br /> assists in establishing a standard in the community for <br /> construction in a new development. The amendment suggested a <br /> need in the community to dispose of sump pump water discharged <br /> from basements without illegal connection to the sanitary sewer <br /> system. If the topography is such to allow discharge into a <br /> streamway located on the property then that would be acceptable. <br /> Mr. Hunt questioned if this proposed change would deal with new <br /> construction. Mr. Weaver answered yes. <br /> Mr. Thomas questioned if this would prohibit discharge into the <br /> street. Mr. Weaver stated that it would. <br /> Mr. Hunt questioned if existing connections could be inspected. <br /> Mr. Weaver stated that the illeqal connections occur following a <br /> final inspection and it becomes legally cumbersome to enter homes <br /> to reinspect. ' <br /> Mr. Hunt questioned if consideration had been given regardinq <br /> cost for new home construction. Mr. Weaver stated that <br /> consideration had been given to cost but overloading of the <br /> sanitary system would cause surcharging and possible future <br /> construction of a new sanitary system. Public Works will be ' <br /> surveyinq neighborhoods and determining where storm water is <br /> coming into the sanitary sewer system. Staff recommends approval <br /> of the petition as presented. <br /> There were no objectors present. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Kaptain/Thomas) and approved that <br /> Cal. No. 93-10 be forwarded to City Council for approval with one <br /> nay vote by Mr. Hunt. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.