My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
91-16 AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
1991
>
91-16 AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2016 4:53:07 PM
Creation date
8/22/2016 4:53:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
91-16
Res Ord Title
AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
Approved Date
2/4/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br /> _ ^ <br /> PETITION FOR ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT <br /> December 17, 1990 <br /> TO: Mayor Gary K. Anderson � <br /> Decatur City Council <br /> Decatur City Plan Commission , <br /> I, David A. Clark, Director of Community Development, hereby re- �! <br /> quest amendment of Section II. 1. of the Zoning Ordinance (Ord. I, <br /> #3512) , such that said section as amended shall read as follows: <br /> 1. ACCESSORY BUILDING OR USE: An accessory building or use is <br /> one which: <br /> a. Is subordinate to and serves a principal building or <br /> principal use and is located on the same lot as said <br /> principal building or use; and <br /> b. Is subordinate in area, height, extent, and purpose <br /> to the principal building or principal use served <br /> and further provided that the aggregate gross area <br /> of two or more accessory buildings shall not exceed <br /> the above limitations except that a minimum qross <br /> area of 750 square feet for such accessory building <br /> or aggregate areas of two or more buildings shall <br /> be permitted; and <br /> c. Is naturally and normally incidental to that of the <br /> dominate use of the main building or land. <br /> The proposed amendment is submitted to clarify language relative <br /> to the size of an accessory building in comparison to the main <br /> building which it serves. Staff is of the opinion that an acces- <br /> sory building should not exceed the size of the main building, <br /> thereby suggesting that the main building is and should be the <br /> dominate land use of any specific lot. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> �,��s� �1 <br /> David A. Clark, Dire�tor <br /> Department of Community Development <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.